2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.07.823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EP08.02-140 MET Biomarker-based Preliminary Efficacy Analysis in SAVANNAH: savolitinib+osimertinib in EGFRm NSCLC Post-Osimertinib

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further in SAVANNAH trial, promising clinical efficacy in a population with high MET amplification and/or high threshold c-MET overexpression level (IHC 90+ and/or FISH 10+) with an ORR 49%, mDoR of 9.3 months, and mPFS of 7.1 months was observed. The safety profile was acceptable, similar to that of TATTON study [ 60 ]. Further results of the SAVANNAH trial are awaited.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Further in SAVANNAH trial, promising clinical efficacy in a population with high MET amplification and/or high threshold c-MET overexpression level (IHC 90+ and/or FISH 10+) with an ORR 49%, mDoR of 9.3 months, and mPFS of 7.1 months was observed. The safety profile was acceptable, similar to that of TATTON study [ 60 ]. Further results of the SAVANNAH trial are awaited.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Initial results from the SAVANNAH trial show a trend toward improved response rates, with increasing level of MET amplified and/or c-MET overexpressed. Across all patients in this analysis, ORR was 32%; mDoR was 8.3 months; and mPFS was 5.3 months, while in high level MET amplification and/or c-MET overexpression subgroup, ORR was 49%; mDoR was 9.3 months; and mPFS was 7.1 months [ 60 ]. A summary of key data after EGFR–TKI resistance with secondary MET alterations treated with combination therapies available so far is provided in Table 6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our data, along with preliminary findings from the phase II SAVANNAH study (NCT03778229; ref. 31 ), highlight the challenges and importance of monitoring MET amplification during treatment, particularly considering the observed association between tumor content and MET amplification detection and the degree of ctDNA decrease during treatment, resulting in a high level of false negatives. This affects the potential to distinguish between true loss of MET amplification versus ctDNA content just decreasing to an undetectable level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%