2007
DOI: 10.1159/000111021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EPACT II: Project and Methods

Abstract: Building on the first European Panel on the Appropriateness of Crohn’s Disease Treatment (EPACT I) which was held in Lausanne at the beginning of March 2004, a new panel will be convened in Switzerland (EPACT II, November to December 2007) to update this work. A combined evidence- and panel-based method (RAND) will be applied to assess the appropriateness of therapy for Crohn’s disease (CD). In preparation for the meeting of experts, reviews of evidence-based literature were prepared for major clinical present… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 71 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EPACT II appropriateness criteria were established for nine broad clinical situations in CD (Table 1): active luminal CD, steroid-dependent or -refractory disease, fistulizing CD, fibro-stenotic CD, upper gastrointestinal CD or extraintestinal manifestations of CD, maintenance of a medically induced or surgically induced remission of CD. 12 Definitions were developed to classify typical patients to be included in each of these clinical situations. The cohort study questionnaires were developed to facilitate inclusion of cases in corresponding clinical situations, by collecting data on variables linked to V V. .…”
Section: Appropriateness Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EPACT II appropriateness criteria were established for nine broad clinical situations in CD (Table 1): active luminal CD, steroid-dependent or -refractory disease, fistulizing CD, fibro-stenotic CD, upper gastrointestinal CD or extraintestinal manifestations of CD, maintenance of a medically induced or surgically induced remission of CD. 12 Definitions were developed to classify typical patients to be included in each of these clinical situations. The cohort study questionnaires were developed to facilitate inclusion of cases in corresponding clinical situations, by collecting data on variables linked to V V. .…”
Section: Appropriateness Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%