2013
DOI: 10.1111/mice.12048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ePAD: Earthquake Probability‐Based Automated Decision‐Making Framework for Earthquake Early Warning

Abstract: The benefits and feasibility of earthquake early warning (EEW) are becoming more appreciated throughout the world. An EEW system detects an earthquake initiation based on a seismic sensor network and broadcasts a warning of the predicted location and magnitude shortly before an earthquake hits a site. The typical range of this lead time is very short, for example, from a few seconds up to a minute in California, which is a huge challenge for applications taking advantage of EEW. As a result, a robust automated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a special work, Wu et al (2013) developed a robust automated decision process called the earthquake probabilitybased automated decision-making (ePAD) framework. The ePAD framework was used to broadcast a warning of the predicted location and magnitude shortly before an earthquake hits a site as part of the EEW in California: CISN ShakeAlert System.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a special work, Wu et al (2013) developed a robust automated decision process called the earthquake probabilitybased automated decision-making (ePAD) framework. The ePAD framework was used to broadcast a warning of the predicted location and magnitude shortly before an earthquake hits a site as part of the EEW in California: CISN ShakeAlert System.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground motion prediction equation (GMPE) development is an important task in structural engineering and engineering seismology (Douglas, ; Zhou and Adeli, ; Alimoradi et al., ; Panakkat and Adeli, ; Wu et al., ; Alimoradi and Beck, ; Chaulagain et al., ), and a number of GMPEs have been developed (Abrahamson et al., ; Campbell and Bozorgnia, ; Chiou and Youngs, ; Idriss, ; Melo et al., ; Stewart et al., ; Stewart et al., ). A typical GMPE for predicting peak ground acceleration (PGA) is: lo normalg10 PGA 0.33em=FM+FD+FS+εwhere FM, FD, and FS represent magnitude, distance, and site effects, respectively; ε is the zero‐mean Gaussian prediction error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many approaches have been proposed for earthquake prediction and estimation (Panakkat and Adeli, , , ; Yuen and Mu ; Wu et al. ; Adeli and Panakkat, ). Based on the requirement of information for the algorithms to estimate earthquake parameters, EEW techniques can be divided into two groups, namely regional warning and on‐site warning techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%