2017
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.9850.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EPHect – the Endometriosis Phenome (and Biobanking) Harmonisation Project – may be very helpful for clinicians and the women they are treating

Abstract: This article acts as a summary of the recently published papers by the World Endometriosis Research Foundation aiming to set up the Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project.  The objective of this project is to standardise recording of patient history and characteristics, recording of surgical procedure and extent of disease as well as collection, processing and storage of specimens and consequently create a reliable resource for research into endometriosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This limitation is now well-acknowledged to frequently yield confusing results. In fact, the WERF EPHect guidelines recommend the adoption of standardized methods for clear annotation, sampling and data mining based on optimized and valid data segregation approaches to avoid the expected high noise in the results [23, 24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This limitation is now well-acknowledged to frequently yield confusing results. In fact, the WERF EPHect guidelines recommend the adoption of standardized methods for clear annotation, sampling and data mining based on optimized and valid data segregation approaches to avoid the expected high noise in the results [23, 24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesized that marked inconsistencies among the observations of endometrial steroid physiology in previous studies might have resulted from the lack of a categorical consideration of the relative effects of fertility and menstrual histories on steroid hormone biosynthesis, metabolism and their receptors in the endometrium of patients with and without ovarian endometriosis (OE). The EPHect guidelines essentially highlight the necessity of developing a consensus on the standardization and harmonization of phenotypic surgical and clinical data and biological sample handling methods in endometriosis research [23, 24]. In the present study, endometrial samples obtained from thirty-two (32) control subjects and fifty-two (52) patients with moderate to severe (stages III-IV) OE who had a known fertility history and menstrual cycle phase registered in a tertiary hospital in New Delhi were examined to determine the intra-tissue concentrations of major sex steroid hormones (P4, T, E1 and E2) and the transcript and protein levels of steroid-synthesizing enzymes (CYP19A1/aromatase, HSD17B1/17β-HSD1, and HSD17B2/17β-HSD2), steroidogenic co-factors (NR5A1/SF-1 and STAR/StAR), and the receptors for estrogen (ESR1/ERα and ESR2/ERβ) and progesterone (PGR/PRA and PRB) to test this concept.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the project was not specifically intended solely for clinical research, combining the patient clinical information along with surgical findings and treatment in a harmonised form should facilitate large-scale multicentre research to provide insight into this heterogeneous disease. 13 Hopefully, this will translate into a better understanding of this disease and optimised care for women affected by endometriosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All specimen collected are part of the Auria biobank sample collection ( https://www.auria.fi/biopankki/en/index.php?lang = en ). The sample collection protocol closely resembles those recommended by World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonization Project and the Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonization Project WERF/EpHECT 20 24 , despite carrying out the collection before those recommendations were published.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%