2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41418-021-00918-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epiblast fragmentation by shedding—a novel mechanism to eliminate cells in post-implantation mouse embryos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data suggest that ectopic upregulation of pERK resulting from loss of Smad4 is detrimental to epiblast cavitation; however, the mechanisms of how these two pathways interact with one another and regulate cavitation remain unclear. SMAD4 could regulate several processes associated with epiblast cavitation, including epiblast cell apoptosis or epiblast cell polarization and lumenogenesis (Bedzhov and Zernicka-Goetz, 2014; Coucouvanis and Martin, 1995; Coucouvanis and Martin, 1999; Halimi et al, 2022) (Fig 5B-C). Alternatively, SMAD4 could promote epiblast maturation, defined here as the transition from a naïve to primed state which normally occurs in epiblast cells between preimplantation and post-implantation stages (Boroviak et al, 2015; Nichols and Smith, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data suggest that ectopic upregulation of pERK resulting from loss of Smad4 is detrimental to epiblast cavitation; however, the mechanisms of how these two pathways interact with one another and regulate cavitation remain unclear. SMAD4 could regulate several processes associated with epiblast cavitation, including epiblast cell apoptosis or epiblast cell polarization and lumenogenesis (Bedzhov and Zernicka-Goetz, 2014; Coucouvanis and Martin, 1995; Coucouvanis and Martin, 1999; Halimi et al, 2022) (Fig 5B-C). Alternatively, SMAD4 could promote epiblast maturation, defined here as the transition from a naïve to primed state which normally occurs in epiblast cells between preimplantation and post-implantation stages (Boroviak et al, 2015; Nichols and Smith, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%