2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2022.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epicardial adipose tissue volume is not an independent predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study shows that total EAT did not present a positive correlation in multivariate analysis despite having a significant prognostic value for AF recurrence (AUC = 0.706, 95% CI: 0.56–0.82, p = 0.006). Similar results questioning the role of pericardial adipose tissue as an independent prognostic factor have been described in a recent study [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The current study shows that total EAT did not present a positive correlation in multivariate analysis despite having a significant prognostic value for AF recurrence (AUC = 0.706, 95% CI: 0.56–0.82, p = 0.006). Similar results questioning the role of pericardial adipose tissue as an independent prognostic factor have been described in a recent study [ 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…8,23- 25 A previous meta-analysis identified EAT as a predictor of AF recurrence after CA; 10 however, the results of individual studies are conflicting. [26][27][28] Studies have varied in their methods of evaluating EAT and LA-EAT, including quantification of total EAT and LA-EAT volumes, with or without indexing by body surface area on CT images, or artificial intelligence (AI) auto-segmentation 3D U-Net model for analyzing CT images from other institutions has not been validated. However, because the AI model was trained using images acquired by the 2 most popular brands of CT scanners, it holds promise for successful autosegmentation of CT images acquired from other hospitals.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%