2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.09.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epicarp characterization of coffee fruits by atomic force microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For apples, the superficial characteristics were investigated and their three-dimensional structure was determined with confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), conventional light microscopy (LM), and environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) (Veraverbeke et al, 2003). Studies in coffee (Cardona et al, 2008) and peach (Yang et al, 2005) have been reported using the atomic force microscopy (AFM) to characterize the roughness of the fruit epicarp and the cells that compose it in different states of development. The different qualities of fruits were studied by obtaining microstructural properties with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and relating them to texture profiles (Allan-Wojtas et al, 2003;Lanza and Di Serio, 2011;Lanza, 2012;Martens and Thybo, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For apples, the superficial characteristics were investigated and their three-dimensional structure was determined with confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), conventional light microscopy (LM), and environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) (Veraverbeke et al, 2003). Studies in coffee (Cardona et al, 2008) and peach (Yang et al, 2005) have been reported using the atomic force microscopy (AFM) to characterize the roughness of the fruit epicarp and the cells that compose it in different states of development. The different qualities of fruits were studied by obtaining microstructural properties with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and relating them to texture profiles (Allan-Wojtas et al, 2003;Lanza and Di Serio, 2011;Lanza, 2012;Martens and Thybo, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Hershko and Nussinovitch (1998), the R a of uncoated onion skin was reported 6.0 ± 3.6 μm by literature and about 78 nm by AFM. Yang et al (2005), Cardona, Oliveros, Arias, Alvarez, and Devia (2008), Czieczor et al (2018), and Ringer et al (2018) reported that the roughness measured by AFM was lower than that measured by other methods for agricultural products. Based on literature review by the authors, the surface profilometer, laser profilometer, and AFM showed the roughness of certain plastics at 0.24 ± 0.11 μm, 0.81 ± 0.06 μm, and 0.73 ± 0.22 nm, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardona et al 43 made a superficial characterisation of the epicarp of coffee fruits. The objective of their study was to characterise the epicarp by analysing the changes in roughness that occur between green and mature coffee fruits and to determine the dimensions and density of cells of the epicarp by the AFM technique.…”
Section: Surface Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%