2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2007.04.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemic spreading on uncorrelated heterogenous networks with non-uniform transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These original works stimulate many related studies [7,14]. Wang et al [17] investigated the effect of non-uniform transmission on the infection threshold and found that the topological structure was not the only factor to dominate the propagation behavior on networks. Olinky and Stone [15] designed a kind of connectivity-dependent infection scheme to yield the non-zero critical threshold even in SF networks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These original works stimulate many related studies [7,14]. Wang et al [17] investigated the effect of non-uniform transmission on the infection threshold and found that the topological structure was not the only factor to dominate the propagation behavior on networks. Olinky and Stone [15] designed a kind of connectivity-dependent infection scheme to yield the non-zero critical threshold even in SF networks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We found the admission time after infection is approximate to a logarithmic normal distribution [43]- [46]. A logarithmic normal random variable [42] was used to model the admission time of infected agents in (8), shown at the bottom of the page. T Adm (μ, σ) is the admission time after infection, μ and σ are its mean and standard deviation, γ 1 and γ 2 are two uniform random numbers in the range [0, 1].…”
Section: Behavior Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30], the authors proposed a kind of connectivity-dependent infection scheme, which can yield threshold effects even in scale-free networks where they would otherwise be unexpected. Additional ingredients include saturation effects [31], constant infectivity [32], nonuniform transmission [33], finite populations [34], traffic-driven mechanisms [35], and piece-wise infection probability [36], which have been integrated into the SIS or SIR models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%