2002
DOI: 10.1253/circj.66.323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiologic and Clinical Characteristics of Cardiomyopathies in Japan. Results From Nationwide Surveys.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
48
1
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
48
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Matsumori et al reported that the 1-year all-cause mortality of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy in Japan was 5.6%. 13 The present study showed a similar all-cause mortality rate in the NICM cohort of 6.0% at 1 year and 12.4% at 3 years after study entry.…”
Section: Prognostic Difference Between the Nicm And MI Cohortssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…12 Matsumori et al reported that the 1-year all-cause mortality of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy in Japan was 5.6%. 13 The present study showed a similar all-cause mortality rate in the NICM cohort of 6.0% at 1 year and 12.4% at 3 years after study entry.…”
Section: Prognostic Difference Between the Nicm And MI Cohortssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, similar or even lower response rates have been reported in other nationwide surveys. 27,28 In addition, when the hospitals that replied and those that did not reply were compared, there were no significant differences in the numbers of total hospital beds (THs: Reply 467±258 beds vs No-reply 446±241 beds, NS; AHs : Reply 262±133 beds vs No-reply 275±141 beds, NS; NTHs: Reply 138±114 beds vs No-reply 143±111 beds, NS) or in the regional distribution (ie, northeast or southwest Japan, urban or rural areas) between the 2 hospital groups, suggesting that a statistical bias caused by the low reply rate should be negligible.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 In a nationwide survey conducted by Matsumori et al in Japan, HCM patients with LVEF <50% comprised 6.2% of all subjects. 17 In the present single cardiovascular center study, 3.2% of the subjects had LVEF <50%. Harris et al also reported a prevalence of 3.5%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%