2001
DOI: 10.2460/javma.2001.218.1898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiologic features of pet evacuation failure in a rapid-onset disaster

Abstract: Pet evacuation failure was common and jeopardized pets' health and well-being. Logistical challenges to transporting pets were substantial contributors to pet evacuation failure, whereas not knowing where to house a pet was only a minor concern. Most pet owners seemed self-reliant and acted appropriately towards their pets. Such self-reliant behavior by pet owners should be encouraged prior to disasters as part of an evacuation plan for households.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…11,[30][31][32][33][34] Owners who are unprepared to evacuate with their pets may refuse to leave their homes, putting their pets, themselves, and rescuers in peril. 11,[30][31][32][33][34] Owners who are unprepared to evacuate with their pets may refuse to leave their homes, putting their pets, themselves, and rescuers in peril.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,[30][31][32][33][34] Owners who are unprepared to evacuate with their pets may refuse to leave their homes, putting their pets, themselves, and rescuers in peril. 11,[30][31][32][33][34] Owners who are unprepared to evacuate with their pets may refuse to leave their homes, putting their pets, themselves, and rescuers in peril.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, studies, reports, and media highlight common occurrences such as animal abandonment and sensational cases of animal hoarding or dog fighting (Arluke 2006). Even studies depicting a range of relationships tend to depict relations as existing along a single continuum, for example, in terms of the strength of the human-animal bond or level of attachment (Salman et al 1998;Heath, Voeks and Glickman 2001). While these accounts represent important aspects of human-canine relations, and potentially a growing segment of American pet owners, alone, they paint an incomplete portrait of the everyday, American pet owner.…”
Section: Understanding Variations In Human-canine Relationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Only a limited number of respondents in the sample reported keeping animals-only 15 mentions of animals appear in the interview record. This small number may have to do with the comparatively large number of recent immigrants to the Chicago area in the interview sample, and it may reflect different cultural standards about animals among the large portion of the sample that originally comes from Mexico and Central America (Wolch and Emel, 1998;Heath, Voeks, and Glickman, 2001). In addition, a disproportionately large portion of the sample had young children, so keeping a pet may be something that these families place on hold while the children are small.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%