Epidemiological and medical aspects of canyoning rescue operations

Soteras, Íñigo; Subirats, Enric; Strapazzon, Giacomo

doi:10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.030

Cited by 16 publications

(47 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] Intra-and inter-observer reliability of the Canyoning Assessement Tool SPORT TK, 9(1) (supl. 1), [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] the individuals, so that there was no influence among peers. Before beginning the observation of the clips, there was a meeting of the observers to discuss the observation grid.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This sports consists of walking or swimming down through a canyon (Silva, Almeida, & Pacheco, 2014; Stephanides & Vohra, 2007), transposing vertical obstacles (Hardiman & Burgin, 2010). This modality is practiced in a natural environment and is influenced by several external factors, some of them very unstable and variable (Montesa & García, 2005), becoming challenging and risky (Soteras, Subirats, & Strapazzon, 2015). The underestimation of these risks, along with the lack of skills, are conditions that exponentially increase the probability of an accident .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1) / Murcia / Enero 2020 / Págs. [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] Intra-and inter-observer reliability of the Canyoning Assessement Tool SPORT TK, 9(1) (supl. 1), 33-42 It was verified that in the manoeuvre 1 the average, the smallest value and the maximum value for the execution time were 98, 49 and 208 seconds respectively.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is shown in manoeuvre 3, for the variable execution time, the average of 115 seconds, the lowest value of 60 sec- Intra-and inter-observer reliability of the Canyoning Assessement Tool SPORT TK, 9(1) (supl. 1), [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] onds and a maximum value of 283 seconds. In the variable time, the execution time has an average of 12.5 A.U., smaller value and greater value of, 9 and 23.5 A.U., respectively.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…33-42Intra-and inter-observer reliability of the Canyoning Assessement Tool SPORT TK, 9(1) (supl. 1),[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Confiabilidad intra e interobservador de la herramienta de evaluación Canyons

Sarmento¹,

Brandão²,

Gonçalves³

et al. 2020

sportk

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Los numerosos manuales técnicos o cursos técnicos no garantizan un buen nivel técnico. Objetivo: validar un instrumento para evaluar las habilidades de maniobras con cuerdas para barranquismo - nivel I. Métodos: 28 individuos, incluidos principiantes (<3 años de experiencia) y practicantes experimentados (≥ 3 años de experiencia) en este deporte. Estos presentaron una edad promedio de 27.5 + - 7.89 años. La ejecución técnica fue grabada en video para su posterior evaluación. Esto fue realizado por tres observadores, todos con experiencia en barranquismo donde dos de ellos enseñaron este deporte en la Universidad. La evaluación se repitió más tarde durante 20 días. Resultados: Los resultados tuvieron buenos niveles de confiabilidad, en el análisis intra- y inter-clase, como en el análisis de prueba / re-prueba. Las variables del Final Score presentan una excelente confiabilidad entre los tres observadores. Conclusión: Después de analizar los resultados, llegamos a la conclusión de que el CAT (Canyoning Assessment Tool) es un instrumento confiable para las habilidades de evaluación en maniobras con cuerdas en el barranquismo. The numerous technical manuals or technical training does not guarantee a good technical level. Objective: Validate an instrument for evaluating the rope manoeuvres skills for canyoning - level I. Methods: 28 individuals, including beginners (<3 years of experience), and experienced practitioners (≥ 3 years of experience) in this sport. These presented an average age of 27.5 +- 7.89 years. The technical execution was recorded in video for further evaluation. This was done by three observers, all experienced in canyoning where two of them teaching this sport at University. The evaluation was replicated later over 20 days. Results: The results had good reliability levels, in the intra- and inter-class analyses, as in the test/re-test analysis. The Final Score variables present excellent reliability among the three observers. Conclusion: After analysing the results, we concluded that the CAT (Canyoning Assessment Tool) is a reliable instrument for evaluation skills in rope manoeuvres in canyoning.

show abstract