2023
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiological Predictors of Positive SARS-CoV-2 Polymerase Chain Reaction Test in Three Cohorts: Hospitalized Patients, Healthcare Workers, and Military Population, Serbia, 2020

Abstract: (1) Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a fast-moving pandemic. Diagnostic testing, aimed to identify patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, plays a key role in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic in different populations. (2) Methods: This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate predictors associated with positive polymerase chain reaction (pcr) SARS-CoV-2 test results in hospitalized patients, healthcare w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first multinomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between variables Q9 (testing for COVID-19) and Q10 (history of clinical signs of COVID- 19). In this analysis, the dependent variable was Q10, which represents the history of clinical signs of COVID-19, categorized into four levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first multinomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between variables Q9 (testing for COVID-19) and Q10 (history of clinical signs of COVID- 19). In this analysis, the dependent variable was Q10, which represents the history of clinical signs of COVID-19, categorized into four levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the broader context of global testing efforts, it is worth noting that the lack of systematic testing across the world has posed challenges to the accuracy of epidemiological data, particularly during the initial stages of the outbreak [19]. Within this framework, the observation that individuals who received positive test results were more prone to indicate greater severity of symptoms compared to those who yielded negative outcomes [20] further accentuates the significance of comprehensive testing approaches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in our previous survey, conducted during 2020, [ 16 ] epidemiological data on the following variables were gathered: demographic data (sex, age), exposure risk factors (treatment in a hospital with COVID-19 cases, contact with a known COVID-19 case within the previous 14 days), clinical signs and symptoms (fever, sore throat, cough, headache, myalgia/arthralgia, fatigue, gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea/vomiting/diarrhoea), and pneumonia (chest X-rays or computed tomography)), and data about comorbidities (no chronic diseases, chronic cardiac disease, cardiomyopathies, hypertension, chronic pulmonary diseases, chronic liver disease, diabetes mellitus, neurological diseases, malignancy, immunodeficiency, chronic kidney disease). The medical technician entered the collected data into a specially created access database daily, under the control of hospital epidemiologist.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%