1966
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.py.04.090166.001451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiological Relations of the Pseudomonad Pathogens of Deciduous Fruit Trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…fraxini does not appear to be related to the presence of rapid diffusing toxins and bacterial activity occurs in the growing season when host defence reactions take place, the slow development of bacterial protuberances becomes evident. A strong bacterial proliferation in spring is also observed in various other bacterial diseases of trees (CROSSE 1966;KONING 1938;RIDB and RIDB 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…fraxini does not appear to be related to the presence of rapid diffusing toxins and bacterial activity occurs in the growing season when host defence reactions take place, the slow development of bacterial protuberances becomes evident. A strong bacterial proliferation in spring is also observed in various other bacterial diseases of trees (CROSSE 1966;KONING 1938;RIDB and RIDB 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Pseudomonas syringae causes damages on pear buds, flowers, leaves and fruits; only in very cold winter conditions can cankers on trunks and branches be observed (Wilson 1936;Crosse 1966;Jones and Aldwinkle 1990). In Belgium and in other countries, economically important diseases are blossom blast and bud deads during winter (Clara 1932;Wormald 1946;Parker and Burkholder 1950;Deckers and Daemen 1991;Montesinos and Vilardell 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These inoculations differed from leaf-scar inoculations in three major respects. The effective inoculum dose was probably massive compared with that in leaf-scar infections (Crosse, 1966) ; the inoculations resulted in mechanical damage to tissues at the site of infection; and they were made at a time (December) when branch tissues were fully dormant and in their most susceptible condition (Shanmuganathan, I 962). It is possible that a hypersensitivity reaction was induced by heterologous bacteria in wound inoculations but was not effective against them at the very high inoculum doses employed.…”
Section: J E C R O S S E a N D C M E G A R R E T Tmentioning
confidence: 99%