2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2018.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiology and etiology of diarrhea in UK military personnel serving on the United Nations Mission in South Sudan in 2017: A prospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This higher percentage of EAEC found in the African region differs from Shah et al, 16 who found EAEC to be infrequently detected in Africa (3/165, 2%), but is in agreement with later findings of ETEC, EPEC, and EAEC frequently detected among Western military personnel in South Sudan, and NoV detected less frequently. 32 Despite these differences in most common pathogens detected, the distribution of single-, multiple-, and no pathogen-detected results showed similar patterns when comparing the SA with the primary analysis, although these differed from the work of Biswas et al 32 who found that nearly 80% of those enrolled in their study had two or more pathogens detected. However, this group used the BioFire Film Array GI panel, which included a wider scope of pathogens than the GTD study, and so may have contributed to the higher proportion of reported coinfections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This higher percentage of EAEC found in the African region differs from Shah et al, 16 who found EAEC to be infrequently detected in Africa (3/165, 2%), but is in agreement with later findings of ETEC, EPEC, and EAEC frequently detected among Western military personnel in South Sudan, and NoV detected less frequently. 32 Despite these differences in most common pathogens detected, the distribution of single-, multiple-, and no pathogen-detected results showed similar patterns when comparing the SA with the primary analysis, although these differed from the work of Biswas et al 32 who found that nearly 80% of those enrolled in their study had two or more pathogens detected. However, this group used the BioFire Film Array GI panel, which included a wider scope of pathogens than the GTD study, and so may have contributed to the higher proportion of reported coinfections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Where a potential focus was suspected (eg, URT symptoms) results from the FilmArray were not conclusive for diagnosis. This is in contrast to testing diarrhoea samples, for example, where FilmArray provided real-time results which affected clinical management 11. It should therefore be noted by providers that qualitative PCR (especially without appropriate interpretation) is not a solution to every testing conundrum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These figures are probably due to the large number of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) cases that occurred in UK military staff during the first 3 months, because these usually required admission for isolation until their symptoms resolved and were then able to return to their units without any need for medical evacuation. 2 Despite a marked decrease in AGE cases, the proportion of patients requiring definitive care from medicine specialists (general physicians) remained high (44% to 47%). Most of the remaining patients received definitive care from the emergency medicine team (41% to 31%), which highlights their important role in supporting the primary healthcare teams dealing with a range of minor illnesses and injuries.…”
Section: Anonymisedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AGE outbreaks remain a problem during the initial stages of UK military deployments, but can be brought under control. 2 Future deployments to similar environments (eg. Mali) are likely to see similar clinical activity and so operational planning should take account of these findings.…”
Section: Anonymisedmentioning
confidence: 99%