2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2019.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiology and prognostic factors of open globe injuries in a Tunisian pediatric population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the penetrating injury was the most common type of open-globe injury in children, followed by blunt rupture, which was similar to the results reported by others in Chinese cities such as Shanghai [7], Wenzhou, and Changsha [9], and other countries as Iran [26], the US [11], and Tunisia [27]. However, the result perhaps was contrary if all kinds of ocular injuries were included; the main cause was a blunt strike to the eye [18,28,29].…”
Section: Etiological and Epidemiological Pro Lesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this study, the penetrating injury was the most common type of open-globe injury in children, followed by blunt rupture, which was similar to the results reported by others in Chinese cities such as Shanghai [7], Wenzhou, and Changsha [9], and other countries as Iran [26], the US [11], and Tunisia [27]. However, the result perhaps was contrary if all kinds of ocular injuries were included; the main cause was a blunt strike to the eye [18,28,29].…”
Section: Etiological and Epidemiological Pro Lesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The proportion of open ocular trauma dropped by nearly one-eighth, mainly due to a decrease in ruptures, penetrating injuries, and intraocular foreign body. Among them, the proportion of rupture and penetrating injury is still the highest, which consistence with some other foreign studies [30][31] . However, the non-mechanical ocular trauma, mainly the chemical injury, increased obviously.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…There wasn't any clinical signi cant in uence of hospital admission delay in terms of visual outcome in our study. Similarly, Wadeai et al and Malek et al did not found the delay in presentation time as a poor prognostic factor in their studies 17,31 . These ndings may be due to the fact that the patients are usually admitted to hospital more urgently after more severe traumas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%