Advances in the Understanding of Gluten Related Pathology and the Evolution of Gluten-Free Foods 2015
DOI: 10.3926/oms.248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiology of Celiac Disease and Non-Celiac Gluten-Related Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Celiac disease (CD) is described as a permanent intolerance to gluten and is the most common chronic intestinal disease in Europe. Its estimated prevalence in Europe is around 1%, and this only refers to those that are diagnosed, since a significant number of patients have not been diagnosed yet [ 1 , 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Celiac disease (CD) is described as a permanent intolerance to gluten and is the most common chronic intestinal disease in Europe. Its estimated prevalence in Europe is around 1%, and this only refers to those that are diagnosed, since a significant number of patients have not been diagnosed yet [ 1 , 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Asian-Pacific countries, wheat consumption also varies from as high as more than 100 kg per year per person in most of the central Asian countries such as Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, to 50-100 kg per year per person in India, China, Australia and New Zealand and under 50 kg per year per person was estimated in Japan, Korea, Indonesia, Israel and Malaysia [96,97]. Due to the low consumption of products containing wheat, along with a low frequency of HLA-DQ2/HLA-DQ8 in South East Asian countries, including Korea, Taiwan, Philippines and the smaller islands of the pacific, CD is still uncommon in these countries [98]. Dermatitis herpetiformis is a relatively rare disease in Asia-Pacific region, and more prevalent in Scandinavian countries and UK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of gluten content is normally performed based on the assumption of a 50:50 ratio between prolamins and glutelins. Nonetheless, a few studies have reported some differences in the ratio between prolamins and glutelins, indicating a factor around 65:35 mainly for rye and barley and depending on the species of the cereal and variety, meaning that when calculating the gluten content, it would be more accurate to use a correlation factor of 1.6 (Mena & Sousa, 2015;Thompson & Méndez, 2008). Besides the ELISA R5 method being the current Type I Codex method for gluten assessment, it only measures the prolamin fraction using a correlation factor of 2 to obtain the total gluten content.…”
Section: General Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, the standard of the Working Group on Prolamin Analysis and Toxicity (WGPAT) for gluten analysis has been the most widely used. Nevertheless, cereals contain a more significant number of proteins than those present in the WGPAT standard (Haraszi et al, 2011;Mena & Sousa, 2015;Slot et al, 2016;Wieser, 2008). Overall, these problems limit the reproducibility of this widely used technique.…”
Section: General Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%