Abstract:Our study of the National Health Insurance database characterized the epidemiology of digital amputation patients undergoing replantation and the facilities in Taiwan where these procedures are performed. The hospitals treating more digital amputation patients had higher attempt rates and lower thumb failure rates.
“…10,19 These are notably higher than Waikakul’s and Chang’s reports of 7% and 8% failure overall. 3,21 This discrepancy has been noted by other North American authors and is often ascribed to higher volume, specialized centers and different values that emphasize body integrity at Asian centers. 4 Chang et al and Liang et al certainly make a strong case for higher volumes in Taiwan; while American studies by Conn et al 28 and Gavrilova et al 29 estimated digital amputation incidence at 1.1 and 2.13 cases per 100 000 person-years, respectively, Chang et al 21 and Liang et al 30 cited figures of 10.2 and 12.5 per 100,000 person-years in Taiwan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…2,9 -11 Low compensation, waning surgeon experience, decentralization from high-volume hospitals, and a paucity of on-call hand specialists have all been implicated to explain the decline in replantations in the United States. 11,15,16,21 At our tertiary care center where a dedicated hand surgeon is always on call, the latter reason cannot be responsible for the downward trend, and the scope of this study does not allow for the assessment of the others in a Canadian context. It is certainly possible that the decline in patients treated with replantation is due to an increase in the number of patients who are treated with revision amputation only; because this study excludes such patients, it is not poised to demonstrate this.…”
Background: Since 1965, the practice of digital replantation has seen great technical strides and become commonplace worldwide. However, some American authors have recently reported declining rates of replantation. We set out to characterize the patient population and describe treatment patterns from 2005 to 2016 at a large Canadian regional replantation center. Methods: A retrospective cohort of all patients undergoing digital replantation and revascularization from 2005 to 2016 was identified. Data were collected on demographics, injuries, procedures, and outcomes. Descriptive statistics were performed, followed by a comparison of two 5-year periods to evaluate temporal trends. Results: A total of 234 patients were treated with 146 replantation and 204 revascularization procedures. Patients were largely male, healthy, and worked as manual labourers. Overall, the failure rate of individual repairs was 28.7%. Over time, there was a trend toward more crush or avulsion and multidigit injuries, and surgeries performed after 2011 were significantly longer. There was a significant downward trend in the number of patients treated at our center each year. Additionally, there was a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of replanted to revised digits in multidigit cases. Discussion: Our observation of declining replantation rates is in line with recent American observations. The reason for this is not obvious but may represent a change in injury characteristics or surgeon attitudes. Conclusion: We suspect that these changes represent a change in workplace safety and injury characteristics, but further studies are needed to assess patient and surgeon treatment decisions.
“…10,19 These are notably higher than Waikakul’s and Chang’s reports of 7% and 8% failure overall. 3,21 This discrepancy has been noted by other North American authors and is often ascribed to higher volume, specialized centers and different values that emphasize body integrity at Asian centers. 4 Chang et al and Liang et al certainly make a strong case for higher volumes in Taiwan; while American studies by Conn et al 28 and Gavrilova et al 29 estimated digital amputation incidence at 1.1 and 2.13 cases per 100 000 person-years, respectively, Chang et al 21 and Liang et al 30 cited figures of 10.2 and 12.5 per 100,000 person-years in Taiwan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…2,9 -11 Low compensation, waning surgeon experience, decentralization from high-volume hospitals, and a paucity of on-call hand specialists have all been implicated to explain the decline in replantations in the United States. 11,15,16,21 At our tertiary care center where a dedicated hand surgeon is always on call, the latter reason cannot be responsible for the downward trend, and the scope of this study does not allow for the assessment of the others in a Canadian context. It is certainly possible that the decline in patients treated with replantation is due to an increase in the number of patients who are treated with revision amputation only; because this study excludes such patients, it is not poised to demonstrate this.…”
Background: Since 1965, the practice of digital replantation has seen great technical strides and become commonplace worldwide. However, some American authors have recently reported declining rates of replantation. We set out to characterize the patient population and describe treatment patterns from 2005 to 2016 at a large Canadian regional replantation center. Methods: A retrospective cohort of all patients undergoing digital replantation and revascularization from 2005 to 2016 was identified. Data were collected on demographics, injuries, procedures, and outcomes. Descriptive statistics were performed, followed by a comparison of two 5-year periods to evaluate temporal trends. Results: A total of 234 patients were treated with 146 replantation and 204 revascularization procedures. Patients were largely male, healthy, and worked as manual labourers. Overall, the failure rate of individual repairs was 28.7%. Over time, there was a trend toward more crush or avulsion and multidigit injuries, and surgeries performed after 2011 were significantly longer. There was a significant downward trend in the number of patients treated at our center each year. Additionally, there was a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of replanted to revised digits in multidigit cases. Discussion: Our observation of declining replantation rates is in line with recent American observations. The reason for this is not obvious but may represent a change in injury characteristics or surgeon attitudes. Conclusion: We suspect that these changes represent a change in workplace safety and injury characteristics, but further studies are needed to assess patient and surgeon treatment decisions.
“…Probabilities of these complications are given in Table 1. 4,5,7,8,9,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies 4,5,6,7,8,9 have evaluated the clinical outcomes associated with replantation and revision amputation. However, there is a dearth of evidence on their cost-effectiveness.…”
“…The repair of vessels, nerves, tendons and bones of amputated digit is essential for the survival and functional recovery of replanted digit 1 – 3 . After the advance of microsurgery in decades, the survival rates of digital replantation have been reported up to 80% 4 , 5 . A satisfactory range of motion and appearance could also be restored by primary replantation and secondary surgeries, if necessary, in most cases 6 .…”
The repair of injured peripheral nerve is still challenging for surgeons. The end-to-end and tension-free neurorrhaphy is the current gold standard for reconstruction after complete nerve transection without significant defect. The main objective of this study neurorrhaphy in digit replantation affects the sensory recovery and neuropathic pain in replanted digit. Total 101 patients who received replantation of single completely amputated digit were included for analysis in this study. In group I (n = 49), the digital nerves were repaired with end-to-end and tension-free neurorrhaphy and then wrapped into a tendon-derived collagen nerve conduit. In group II (n = 52), the digital nerves were repaired with end-to-end and tension-free neurorrhaphy only. The static two-point discrimination (s2PD) was performed to evaluate sensory recovery. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores of pain at rest and with exertion were measured respectively. The s2PD tests at three and six months after surgery did not show any significant difference between the two groups. The VAS scores at rest and with exertion of group I were significantly reduced compared with those of group II at three and six months after surgery. Thus, we concluded that nerve wrap into a collagen conduit after end-to-end and tension-free neurorrhaphy could attenuate neuropathic pain after digit replantation but have no benefit for sensory recovery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.