A total of 102 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates collected from 50 injured service members (June 2009 to December 2011) at U.S. military treatment facilities were analyzed for the conventional mecA gene and mecC homologue by using standard PCR-based methods. The prevalence of the mecC homologue was zero.
Management and prevention of infections due to multidrugresistant organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), are critical components of combat care. Among deployed military personnel, skin and soft tissue infections due to MRSA are widespread, resulting in significant morbidity and affecting the operational readiness of the troops (1-3). The control and prevention of MRSA infections require reliable identification of the organism and subsequent isolation of infected/ colonized individuals (4). Rapid screening for MRSA using PCRbased assays has led to faster detection of MRSA and, consequently, earlier isolation of patients colonized with MRSA (5). Hence, some major U.S. military treatment facilities (MTFs), including Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC) and San Antonio Military Medical Center (SAMMC), have switched from standard culture techniques to the use of the Xpert MRSA PCR assay (Cepheid) for identifying MRSA colonization. Injured service members are either screened at hospital admission (WRNMMC) or upon admission to the intensive care unit (SAMMC) for nasal MRSA carriage using the Xpert MRSA assay.The Xpert MRSA assay is a real-time PCR assay that detects the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec element (SCCmec)-orfX junction. The SCCmec is a transposon-encoded genetic region that carries the mecA gene. The mecA gene confers methicillin resistance among S. aureus isolates (6) by encoding an altered penicillin binding protein (PBP), specifically PBP2a, that confers reduced affinity to all -lactams. In recent years, however, a novel MRSA isolate carrying a novel mecA gene (mecC or mecA LGA 251 ) has been identified (7). While MRSA isolates with this novel gene are phenotypically PBP2a positive, they are not detected by the Xpert (Cepheid) assay used for the identification of MRSA (8). Therefore, the exclusive use of the Xpert MRSA assay (Cepheid) method to screen injured service members for MRSA carriage could result in the misclassification of an S. aureus isolate as susceptible to methicillin, when it actually is not, thereby raising questions about the adequacy of the current infection control policies at two of the major U.S. MTFs. Thus, to evaluate the appropriateness of our current infection control measures, we examined all MRSA isolates collected from U.S. service members injured during deployment and transitioned through Germany for the presence of the novel mecA homologue.Since June 2009, U.S. military personnel injured during deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan and admitted to a participating U.S. MTF (WRNMMC and SAMMC), after receiving initial care at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (Germany), have had their data (e.g....