2017
DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiology of preterm birth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

10
331
3
28

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 432 publications
(372 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
10
331
3
28
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent evidence has suggested that developmental programming on the background of preterm birth may be particularly important for future outcomes [4][5][6]. Approximately 11% of all births worldwide [7] and 10% in the US [8,9] occur preterm (gestational age < 37 weeks), and >95% of preterm infants in developed countries now survive into adulthood [6]. As a result, large numbers of preterm survivors (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent evidence has suggested that developmental programming on the background of preterm birth may be particularly important for future outcomes [4][5][6]. Approximately 11% of all births worldwide [7] and 10% in the US [8,9] occur preterm (gestational age < 37 weeks), and >95% of preterm infants in developed countries now survive into adulthood [6]. As a result, large numbers of preterm survivors (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just over 11% of all infants born world-wide in 2010 were born preterm, (Blencowe et al, 2013), with risks of almost 10% in the United States (2015;Purisch & Gyamfi-Bannerman, 2017) and nearly 8% in Canada (2013;Statistics Canada, 2016) and the United Kingdom (1996Zeitlin et al, 2013). The smallest and most vulnerable of these infants are born at extremely low birth weight (ELBW; <1,000 g), and are exposed to significant prenatal (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, 11% of all live births are preterm with variations from 18% in some African countries to 5% in the Scandinavian countries (Blencowe et al, ). The etiology of preterm birth has been studied intensively without any convincing breakthrough to reduce the frequency (Blencowe et al, ; Purisch and Gyamfi‐Bannerman, ). However, interpretation of preterm rates is complicated, and while rates of spontaneous preterm birth are decreasing, iatrogenic preterm birth rates are increasing (Ananth and Vintzileos, ; Lucovnik et al, ; Moutquin, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%