(Osborne, 1992) and different studies of prognosis have yielded widely differing results (Hawkins, 1993). We have selected four putative biochemical indices of prognosis and evaluated them in a prospective study. The putative markers chosen were the oestrogen receptor (ER), the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), cathepsin D (cath D) and cyclic AMP-binding protein(s) (c-AMP-b).The oestrogen receptor, a nuclear protein (Mr 66 kDa) has been shown to relate to both endocrine sensitivity (Jensen, 1975) and prognosis in multiple studies, including our own previous work (Humeniuk et al., 1982;Hawkins et al., 1987aHawkins et al., , 1991, although some consider that it is only of prognostic significance in the early years after treatment (e.g. Saez et al., 1983). The receptor for epidermal growth factor is a membrane protein (Mr 180 kDa), which has been reported to be a sign of bad prognosis, again in multiple studies (Sainsbury et al., 1987;Gasparini et al., 1992). The proteolytic enzyme, cathepsin D (Mr 52 kDa), has been suggested to be involved in metastasis formation and reported in several studies also to be a sign of bad prognosis when present in high levels (for a review see Rochefort, 1990). Lastly, work in our own laboratories and elsewhere has demonstrated that high levels of cyclic AMP-binding protein(s), the regulatory subunits of the enzyme protein kinase A, represent another sign of poor prognosis, in both retrospective (Miller et al., 1990) and prospective (Miller et al., 1993)