2021
DOI: 10.1080/20009666.2021.1961993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidural pneumorrhachis in COVID-19: a rare clinical entity

Abstract: Pneumorrhachis is an extremely rare clinical entity, involving air entrapment within the spinal canal. We present a unique case of epidural pneumorrhachis accompanying pneumomediastinum and pneumopericardium, in the setting of COVID-19 infection in a 62-year-old woman. Diagnostic testing was remarkable for elevated inflammatory markers, along with mild transaminitis and hyponatremia. CT scan of the chest revealed extensive patchy groundglass opacities, with no evidence of pulmonary embolism. Intravenous antibi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the incidence of radiologically visible intraspinal air after neuraxial access attempts needs to be quantified among our institution's peripartum patients spanning the same seven-year period. It was deemed safe to hypothesize that the retrospective incidence of radiologically visible intraspinal air after neuraxial access attempts would most likely be commoner than the retrospective incidence of radiologically visible intracranial air after neuraxial access attempts considering that neuraxial access attempts especially epidural access attempts involve loss-of-resistance technique which more often than not becomes injection-of-air technique, unknowingly and inadvertently [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the incidence of radiologically visible intraspinal air after neuraxial access attempts needs to be quantified among our institution's peripartum patients spanning the same seven-year period. It was deemed safe to hypothesize that the retrospective incidence of radiologically visible intraspinal air after neuraxial access attempts would most likely be commoner than the retrospective incidence of radiologically visible intracranial air after neuraxial access attempts considering that neuraxial access attempts especially epidural access attempts involve loss-of-resistance technique which more often than not becomes injection-of-air technique, unknowingly and inadvertently [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%