2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epigenetic disturbances in in vitro cultured gametes and embryos: implications for human assisted reproduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
120
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
2
120
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Animal models have confirmed that techniques used in ART can cause epigenetic perturbations at imprinted (and other) loci (El Hajj and Haaf, 2013, Grace and Sinclair, 2009, Laprise, 2009. The animal models have the added attraction that infertility is not a confounding factor.…”
Section: Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Imprinting Disordersmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Animal models have confirmed that techniques used in ART can cause epigenetic perturbations at imprinted (and other) loci (El Hajj and Haaf, 2013, Grace and Sinclair, 2009, Laprise, 2009. The animal models have the added attraction that infertility is not a confounding factor.…”
Section: Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Imprinting Disordersmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Interestingly, data in support for such a genome-wide abnormality of DNA methylation in ART pregnancies is scarce, 18,20 as most available studies have focused on specific loci related to imprinted genes. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Katari et al, 20 using a custom-designed methylation array platform that examined methylation differences in placenta and cord blood samples from ART (N D 10) and naturally conceived (N D 13) pregnancies. The authors analyzed a total of 1,536 CpG sites, most of which were located in the promoters of 736 selected genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some of these studies found that ART is associated with abnormal DNA methylation in human gametes, embryos, [12][13][14] placentas, 15 and umbilical cord samples, 16 other studies concluded that this association is not significant. [17][18][19] These apparently conflicting data may be attributed, at least in part, to methodological limitations of some of these studies, such as the inclusion of mixed populations in the study group (e.g., ovulation induction, IVF, and ICSI) and lack of information regarding potential confounders (e.g., indication for ART, treatment protocol, use of cleavage stage embryos vs. blastocysts, and use of frozen vs. fresh embryos).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A balanced expression of imprinted genes is indeed essential for normal embryo development, placental differentiation and pre-and postnatal growth, but also for normal neurobehavioral processes and metabolism [2,20]. Data from mouse experiments and the in vitro production of livestock provide strong evidence that imprint establishment in late oocyte stages and reprogramming of the two germline genomes for somatic development after fertilization are vulnerable to environmental cues [20]. During early life, an organism is able to adjust its phenotypic development in response to environmental cues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%