Transgenerational Epigenetics 2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-816363-4.00019-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epigenetic inheritance across multiple generations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of such methylation‐based regulatory mechanisms include reversible marking of boundaries between euchromatin and heterochromatin at m CHH (H = A, C, T) sites mediated by small interfering RNA (siRNA) (Khraiwesh et al., 2012; Li et al., 2015; Roudier et al., 2009), changes in the expression state of epialleles mediated by repeat sequences near the affected gene (Weigel & Colot, 2012), or methyltransferase enzymes that transfer or de novo create methylation marks at CpG, CpHpH or CpNpG (N = A, C, G, T) sites (Cao & Jacobsen, 2002). These mechanisms play a role in phenotypic plasticity (Nicotra et al., 2010) and stress‐related adaptation in plants (Boyko & Kovalchuk, 2008) and can be transmitted to the next generation (Henderson & Jacobsen, 2007; Jablonka & Raz, 2009; Thamban et al., 2019; Verhoeven & van Gurp, 2012). The involvement of epigenetic regulation in ecological and evolutionary responses could resolve the paradox of rapid local phenotypic differentiation in invasive plant species with limited genetic variation and a short time since introduction (Richards et al., 2012; Schrieber & Lachmuth, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of such methylation‐based regulatory mechanisms include reversible marking of boundaries between euchromatin and heterochromatin at m CHH (H = A, C, T) sites mediated by small interfering RNA (siRNA) (Khraiwesh et al., 2012; Li et al., 2015; Roudier et al., 2009), changes in the expression state of epialleles mediated by repeat sequences near the affected gene (Weigel & Colot, 2012), or methyltransferase enzymes that transfer or de novo create methylation marks at CpG, CpHpH or CpNpG (N = A, C, G, T) sites (Cao & Jacobsen, 2002). These mechanisms play a role in phenotypic plasticity (Nicotra et al., 2010) and stress‐related adaptation in plants (Boyko & Kovalchuk, 2008) and can be transmitted to the next generation (Henderson & Jacobsen, 2007; Jablonka & Raz, 2009; Thamban et al., 2019; Verhoeven & van Gurp, 2012). The involvement of epigenetic regulation in ecological and evolutionary responses could resolve the paradox of rapid local phenotypic differentiation in invasive plant species with limited genetic variation and a short time since introduction (Richards et al., 2012; Schrieber & Lachmuth, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on various model organisms have revealed that in addition to inheritance of DNA and histone modifications, small non-coding RNAs such as siRNAs, miRNAs, and piRNAs also form vectors for inheritance of acquired non-genetic information [9, 10]. piRNAs and Piwi proteins are associated with the protection of the genome in the germline from transposable elements and have been shown to be inherited and inducer of transgenerational epigenetic silencing[11, 12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%