2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.12.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epigenetic modulation of gene expression governs the brain's response to injury

Abstract: Mild stress from ischemia, seizure, hypothermia, or infection can produce a transient neuroprotected state in the brain. In the neuroprotected state, the brain responds differently to a severe stress and sustains less injury. At the genomic level, the response of the neuroprotected brain to a severe stress is characterized by widespread differential regulation of genes with diverse functions. This reprogramming of gene expression observed in the neuroprotected brain in response to a stress is consistent with a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SPRR1 may be induced by hypomethylating agents and its expression may be modulated by histone modification [ 97 ]. Similarly to the impact of 5-azacytidine on keratinocytes, SPRR1 expression is increased in these cells after treatment with an HDAC inhibitor such as sodium butyrate.…”
Section: Axon Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPRR1 may be induced by hypomethylating agents and its expression may be modulated by histone modification [ 97 ]. Similarly to the impact of 5-azacytidine on keratinocytes, SPRR1 expression is increased in these cells after treatment with an HDAC inhibitor such as sodium butyrate.…”
Section: Axon Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, if a transcript’s expression was induced or suppressed as part of a compensatory and/or adaptive response to AHR, then its expression might also appear normalized by loss of ASIC1a, since ASIC1a −/− mice lack AHR ( 66 ). In the latter case, such transcripts might be beneficial and/or have protective effects ( 38 , 78 , 84 ). We also conceived that signature 1 transcripts might have no bearing or role in AHR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding suggests that the majority of transcripts comprising signature 1 were likely compensatory and/or potentially protective in nature. Indeed, previous studies have demonstrated that a sublethal stressor in the nervous system can produce a “damage refractory” state that protects the nervous system from subsequent injury (preconditioning and tolerance) ( 38 , 78 , 84 ). In rats preconditioned with brief seizures, the transcriptional response of the hippocampus to a subsequent seizure is characterized by a neuroprotective suppression of Ca 2+ signaling ( 38 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrosative stress may lead to BBB breakdown, inflammation, and caspase activation, which ultimately lead to cell apoptosis through interacting with different cellular signaling pathways including matrix metalloproteinase, high-mobility group box 1, toll-like receptors 2 and 4, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, Src, Rhoassociated protein kinase (ROCK), and glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3β (Radi et al, 2015). Oxidative stress may also influence epigenetic mechanisms (i.e., DNA methylation, histone modification, microRNAs) (Zhao et al, 2016;Narne et al, 2017), well known to be implicated in neuroprotection (Felling and Song, 2015;Simon, 2016;Chandran et al, 2017). Therefore, it has been suggested that ROS may contribute themselves to neuronal recovery after ischemic stroke.…”
Section: Hausenloy Et Al 2014mentioning
confidence: 99%