2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-14098-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epigenetic reprogramming at estrogen-receptor binding sites alters 3D chromatin landscape in endocrine-resistant breast cancer

Abstract: Endocrine therapy resistance frequently develops in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer, but the underlying molecular mechanisms are largely unknown. Here, we show that 3-dimensional (3D) chromatin interactions both within and between topologically associating domains (TADs) frequently change in ER+ endocrine-resistant breast cancer cells and that the differential interactions are enriched for resistance-associated genetic variants at CTCFbound anchors. Ectopic chromatin interactions are preferentia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
102
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
8
102
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The relevance of these long-range chromatin interactions to breast cancer is demonstrated by work showing that aberrant genomic amplification of ER-occupied enhancers can negatively impact on survival and therapy response through the formation of novel rogue long-range target-promoter interactions ( 54-56 ). Furthermore, an altered chromatin organization pattern ( 51 ) and differential chromatin interactions both within and between topologically associating domains were found to be associated with endocrine resistance ( 57 ), indicating that 3D epigenome dysregulation is a common feature of transformed cells and of treatment-refractory breast cancer.…”
Section: Estrogen Receptor Binds Dna At Enhancers Which Are Distal Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relevance of these long-range chromatin interactions to breast cancer is demonstrated by work showing that aberrant genomic amplification of ER-occupied enhancers can negatively impact on survival and therapy response through the formation of novel rogue long-range target-promoter interactions ( 54-56 ). Furthermore, an altered chromatin organization pattern ( 51 ) and differential chromatin interactions both within and between topologically associating domains were found to be associated with endocrine resistance ( 57 ), indicating that 3D epigenome dysregulation is a common feature of transformed cells and of treatment-refractory breast cancer.…”
Section: Estrogen Receptor Binds Dna At Enhancers Which Are Distal Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the existence of this cyclic ER binding to chromatin was called into question ( 177 ). However, the method used by Holding et al relies on using the insulator protein CTCF to normalize the ER chromatin profile, with multiple studies showing interconnectivity between these 2 proteins ( 57 , 178-180 ), thereby potentially confounding the resolution of the normalization approach. In addition, it is unclear whether the lack of cycling observed by Holding et al is a phenomenon linked to the specific method used (ie, ChIP-seq might lack the resolution required to observe cycling) or a more general conclusion.…”
Section: Manipulating Transcription Factor Dynamics—an Alternative Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies of allele-specific methylation indicate that genomic loci stochastically switch between two metastable states -completely methylated, or completely unmethylated 24 . These bistable switches play an important role in cancer and drug resistance through the generation of phenotypic heterogeneity 25,26 . Epigenetic switching also plays a critical role in T-cell fate specification 27 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i) Hierarchical clustering of methylation levels of CpG cluster 2 (n=12 706). j) Boxplot showing average DNA methylation of Cluster 2 CpGs when Oslo2 tumors were separated into lymphocyte infiltration quartile groups from low (1) to high (4). Wilcoxon rank-sum p-values (two-group comparisons) and Kruskal-Wallis p-values (three or more groups) are indicated.…”
Section: Cluster 1 Cpgsmentioning
confidence: 99%