2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12935-020-01640-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epigenetic signature predicts overall survival clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Abstract: Background Recently, increasing study have found that DNA methylation plays an important role in tumor, including clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Methods We used the DNA methylation dataset of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database to construct a 31-CpG-based signature which could accurately predict the overall survival of ccRCC. Meanwhile, we constructed a nomogram to predict the prognosis of patients with ccRCC. Result Through LASSO Cox regression analysis, we obtained the 31-CpG-based epigenetic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For monitoring the status of anal carcinoma, three rules for recognizing three different clusters separately include the functional probes cg01550828 and cg18954144, both of which are associated with anal tumorigenesis as we have discussed above. According to our rules, a higher methylation level of cg01550828 and a lower methylation level of cg18954144 indicate a pathogenic status of anal carcinoma, consistent with previous studies ( 46 , 47 ). Interestingly, we also identified lower methylation of cg01550828, associated with gene RNF168 as a biomarker for pathogenesis of intermediate status (precancerous lesions/intraepithelial neoplasia), providing a novel approach for predicting the precancerous lesion stage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For monitoring the status of anal carcinoma, three rules for recognizing three different clusters separately include the functional probes cg01550828 and cg18954144, both of which are associated with anal tumorigenesis as we have discussed above. According to our rules, a higher methylation level of cg01550828 and a lower methylation level of cg18954144 indicate a pathogenic status of anal carcinoma, consistent with previous studies ( 46 , 47 ). Interestingly, we also identified lower methylation of cg01550828, associated with gene RNF168 as a biomarker for pathogenesis of intermediate status (precancerous lesions/intraepithelial neoplasia), providing a novel approach for predicting the precancerous lesion stage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The next probe cg25578064 regulates gene SFRS6, which is also a key driver gene for multiple gastrointestinal cancer subtypes ( 45 ), although it has no direct link with anal cancer. No functional genes were annotated around probe cg18954144 but the CpG site has been reported to be a typical signature for cancer overall survival ( 46 ), indicating that such probe may also be valuable for anal carcinoma monitoring. The final biomarker probe cg01550828 regulates a functional gene RNF168, encoding a ring finger protein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several groups have used multi-omic data analysis to reveal groups of differentially methylated and expressed genes in surgically resected specimens of RCC or in the open data of ccRCC in TCGA (TCGA Research Network). The evidence generated confirms cluster analysis based on genomewide promoter methylation serves to identify panels of methylated genes associated to ccRCC disease progression [17,34,[72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83]. Some of these panels have been validated in an independent retrospective cohort and some have been incorporated into prognostic risk score models to enhance their prognostic biomarker effect [77,78].…”
Section: Dna Methylation As Marker Of Rcc Prognosismentioning
confidence: 62%
“…A number of studies have attempted to develop models to predict the prognosis in ccRCC patients based on gene sequencing and clinical data (Li et al, 2020a;Chen et al, 2020;Hua et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2020;Zhong et al, 2020;Xing et al, 2021). However, few results have been applied in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%