Feed Efficiency in the Beef Industry 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118392331.ch13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epigenetics and Effects on the Neonate That May Impact Feed Efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of the effects of nutrition during the neonatal period of lambs are scarce but some (Davies and Owen, 1967;Greenwood et al, 2004;Galvani et al, 2014) have revealed an open window during this early stage of life where the milk intake level generates long-term effects on feed efficiency. However, the underlying mechanisms responsible for the differences in feed efficiency, which might be multifactorial (e.g., differences in digestion, absorption, or metabolic use of absorbed nutrients, as well as modifications in gene expression or activation of the immune response), are not completely understood (Meyer et al, 2012;Gotoh, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of the effects of nutrition during the neonatal period of lambs are scarce but some (Davies and Owen, 1967;Greenwood et al, 2004;Galvani et al, 2014) have revealed an open window during this early stage of life where the milk intake level generates long-term effects on feed efficiency. However, the underlying mechanisms responsible for the differences in feed efficiency, which might be multifactorial (e.g., differences in digestion, absorption, or metabolic use of absorbed nutrients, as well as modifications in gene expression or activation of the immune response), are not completely understood (Meyer et al, 2012;Gotoh, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many species, maternal nutrient restriction during gestation can alter fetal growth, resulting in impaired development, low birth weight offspring, and potential long-term consequences (Wu et al, 2006;Caton and Hess, 2010;Reynolds et al, 2010). Beef cows are often undernourished during gestation due to limiting forage quality and quantity, and ruminant offspring intestinal tissues are responsive to maternal nutrition during gestation (reviewed in Meyer et al, 2012a). Because organogenesis of the fetus occurs in early to midgestation, maternal nutrition during this period may have a more pronounced effect on small intestinal development (Fowden et al, 2006;Nathanielsz, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic selection based on RFI may result in substantial reductions in costs of production, manure nitrogen, phosphorus excretion, and methane emissions by livestock (Herd et al, 2003;Hegarty et al, 2007;Basarab et al, 2013;Knapp et al, 2014). Studies have reported some of the biochemical and physiological mechanisms controlling RFI (e.g., Herd et al, 2004;Kolath et al, 2006;Bottje and Carstens, 2012;Davis et al, 2012;Meyer et al, 2012;Montanholi et al, 2013a), but available information is still scarce regarding a plausible link between mineral utilization and RFI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%