2016
DOI: 10.1177/1357034x15590485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epigenetics and Obesity

Abstract: Bourdieu suggested that the habitus contains the 'genetic information' which both allows and disposes successive generations to reproduce the world they inherit from their parents' generation. While his writings on habitus are concerned with embodied dispositions, biological processes are not a feature of the practical reason of habitus. Recent critiques of the separate worlds of biology and culture, and the rise in epigenetics, provide new opportunities for expanding theoretical concepts like habitus. Using o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such issues may appear remote from the matters under consideration in this article, yet the nature of the common world from which ‘addicts’ are excluded is a relevant concern. It is a concern not specifically addressed by studies which are otherwise attuned to the benefits of political analyses that incorporate actors traditionally assumed to exist on different planes, such as Wilson’s (2015) account of the randomized control trial as an assemblage, Martin’s (2006, 2010) ethnographies of the brain, and Warin and colleagues’ (2016) analysis of obesity and epigenetics. Each of these studies exemplifies the productiveness of dismantling traditional hierarchies such as ‘social’ and ‘biological’, but it is necessary to also consider hierarchies within these domains, including social exclusion.…”
Section: The Political Limits Of the ‘Common World’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such issues may appear remote from the matters under consideration in this article, yet the nature of the common world from which ‘addicts’ are excluded is a relevant concern. It is a concern not specifically addressed by studies which are otherwise attuned to the benefits of political analyses that incorporate actors traditionally assumed to exist on different planes, such as Wilson’s (2015) account of the randomized control trial as an assemblage, Martin’s (2006, 2010) ethnographies of the brain, and Warin and colleagues’ (2016) analysis of obesity and epigenetics. Each of these studies exemplifies the productiveness of dismantling traditional hierarchies such as ‘social’ and ‘biological’, but it is necessary to also consider hierarchies within these domains, including social exclusion.…”
Section: The Political Limits Of the ‘Common World’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the mothers observed ethnographically, provided their children with daily home cooked meals, but also purchased snack foods and sugar sweetened beverages throughout the day. This observations is supported by the sociological literature demonstrating that cheap calorie dense foods are an affordable means to demonstrate care within families with limited financial resources [55,56].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Our concern is that, as scientific knowledge is a coproduction subject to social forces (Jasanoff, 2004), new research that seeks to understand preconception as an important window for intervention will continue to frame this in a way that is overly focused on female bodies, without the "epistemic modesty" (Pickersgill, 2016) that is perhaps necessary in what is a rapidly shifting area of research. Furthermore, the "temporal ambiguity" of the preconception period (Waggoner, 2013, p. 356) is amplified in the DOHaD framework, which postulates epigenetic mechanisms and a view of life stages as a series of "folds" rather than linear sequences (Warin et al, 2015;Mansfield, 2017;Pentecost and Cousins, 2017;Meloni, 2018). Despite the positive possibilities of the kinds of relationality that the "postgenomic body" might afford, the pragmatic translation of the science most often reverts to a foregrounding of the maternal body and the female reproductive body as sites of intervention (Meloni, 2018;Pentecost and Ross, 2019).…”
Section: New Kinds Of Evidence For Preconception Intervention? Some Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While life course models of intervention are linear and rooted in individual bodies, epigenetic models disrupt this linearity, offering repeated metaphors of "scaffolding" or "Russian dolls", i.e., of life enveloped within itself (Warin et al, 2015;Meloni, 2018). Social scientists return frequently to describe this in terms of strata or folds (Warin et al, 2015;Mansfield, 2017;Pentecost and Cousins, 2017).…”
Section: Anticipating New Normsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation