2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epigenetics and Sex-Specific Fitness: An Experimental Test Using Male-Limited Evolution in Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract: When males and females have different fitness optima for the same trait but share loci, intralocus sexual conflict is likely to occur. Epigenetic mechanisms such as genomic imprinting (in which expression is altered according to parent-of-origin) and sex-specific maternal effects have been suggested as ways by which this conflict can be resolved. However these ideas have not yet been empirically tested. We designed an experimental evolution protocol in Drosophila melanogaster that enabled us to look for epigen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This maternal effect was also attributed to environmental factors such as maternal diet (Wolf et al 1998). Paternal inheritance of the X chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster, which caused decreased male fitness, was also hypothesized to have maternal epigenetic effects (Abbot et al 2013). Moreover, the mealybug reproduction system is governed by an epigenetic process involving DNA imprinting by DNA methylation (Bongiorni et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This maternal effect was also attributed to environmental factors such as maternal diet (Wolf et al 1998). Paternal inheritance of the X chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster, which caused decreased male fitness, was also hypothesized to have maternal epigenetic effects (Abbot et al 2013). Moreover, the mealybug reproduction system is governed by an epigenetic process involving DNA imprinting by DNA methylation (Bongiorni et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the control populations these females were wildtype LHM females, and in the MLX populations they were the backcrossed DX females. The total initial population size was therefore 960 individuals, but this was later reduced to 640 individuals (320 of each sex) for logistical reasons (Abbott et al 2013). The X-chromosome population size was inevitably lower in the MLX populations compared to the Control populations under this protocol, since females in the MLX populations do not carry wildtype X-chromosomes.…”
Section: Experimental Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, males who inherit the counter-selected femalelike version of a sexually antagonistically selected trait (and females who inherit a counter-selected malelike trait) may evolve compensatory strategies to reduce the cost of sexually antagonistic selection (e.g. Abbott et al, 2013).…”
Section: Genetic Correlations Between Homologous Traits In the Two Sexesmentioning
confidence: 99%