2020
DOI: 10.7555/jbr.33.20190016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epileptic seizure detection using EEG signals and extreme gradient boosting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the regularization parameter ( C ) is set to 100 and gamma value is set to 0.0001. Gradient boosting classifier (GB) [ 39 ] is also an ensemble technique that is based on the assumption that many weak learners, when combined generate a stronger learning model. Rather than fitting a predictor to the data at each iteration, it fits a new predictor to the residual errors of the previous prediction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the regularization parameter ( C ) is set to 100 and gamma value is set to 0.0001. Gradient boosting classifier (GB) [ 39 ] is also an ensemble technique that is based on the assumption that many weak learners, when combined generate a stronger learning model. Rather than fitting a predictor to the data at each iteration, it fits a new predictor to the residual errors of the previous prediction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and a multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN) were accustomed to decompose a time phase graphical record into intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) on that autoregressive (AR) parameters were extracted, combined, and fed to the MLPNN classifier [23]. AN experiment doles out on an in public offered dataset [31][32], comprising traditional, interictal, and ictic graphical record signals achieved a classification accuracy of up to ninety-eight. smoothened pseudo-Wigner-Ville distribution gave 98.9% of accuracy [24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a lot of work is available for automatic seizure detection but very less work has been explored for the problem of multi-class classification of different epileptic seizure types, summarized as follows. Wijayanto et al (2019) performed 5-class seizure type classification by extracting the statistical features from the Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) components and used SVM to obtain accuracy, specificity, and recall of 95%, 98.75% and 95% respectively; (Roy et al, 2019) obtained correlation coefficient matrix after employing two pre-processing methods based on Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and obtained the highest f1-score of 90.7% using K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) for 7-class seizure type classification; (Saputro et al, 2019) achieved an accuracy, specificity and sensitivity of 91.4%, 97.83% and 90.25% respectively on a combination of MFCC and hjorth descriptor based features using SVM; and (Vanabelle et al, 2020) performed 2-class classification (focal vs. generalized) using a combination of 22 temporal and frequential features following the standard partitioning and Leave One Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV) methods with XGBoost to obtain classification results as f1-score, precision, specificity and recall of 33.60%-51.33%, 27.55%-40.01%, 73.04%-92.50% and 35.80%-78.72% respectively. Most of the authors have explored a variety of deep learning based architecture models for current multi-class classification problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%