2015
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.12493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epiphytic lichen diversity along elevational gradients: biological traits reveal a complex response to water and energy

Abstract: Aim Patterns of epiphytic lichen diversity along elevational gradients covering the range of Norway spruce forests were analysed. The roles of water and energy variables in shaping the observed species-elevation relationship were tested, as well as how growth form and photobiont type distribution varied along the gradient.Location South Tyrol, northern Italy.Methods Eight sites were selected spanning the elevational range of spruce forests (900-1900 m a.s.l.) and the regional rainfall gradient. At each site, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
59
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
9
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we found species having a crustose growth form at lower elevations while species having a foliose and fruticose growth form were more frequent at higher elevation sites. This is in line with elevational studies from the alpine region demonstrating similar patterns (Dietrich andScheidegger 1997, Nascimbene andMarini 2015). We argue that water availability at higher elevations is the main explanation for the prevalence of foliose and fruticose species.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of the Response Of Lichen Communities Along Elevasupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we found species having a crustose growth form at lower elevations while species having a foliose and fruticose growth form were more frequent at higher elevation sites. This is in line with elevational studies from the alpine region demonstrating similar patterns (Dietrich andScheidegger 1997, Nascimbene andMarini 2015). We argue that water availability at higher elevations is the main explanation for the prevalence of foliose and fruticose species.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of the Response Of Lichen Communities Along Elevasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…air humidity) as a determinant of fruticose lichen distribution has been shown recently by Gauslaa (). Furthermore, Nascimbene and Marini () demonstrated an increase of fruticose species with elevation but with a negative response to a high level of precipitation. The importance of fog has a well understood influence on lichen growth forms in desert habitats (Rundel ) – and fruticose taxa occurred only in the fog‐influenced sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Bryophyte and macrolichen richness per plot is quite high (as we only sampled 4 m 2 of forest floor and 0.64 m 2 of bark surface) compared with other regions (for lichens: Boch, Prati et al., ; Cleavitt, Clyne, & Fahey, ; Nascimbene & Marini, ; for bryophytes: Horvat, Heras, García‐Mijangos, & Biurrun, and Müller et al., ). We did not sample crustose lichen species, but as their richness is often much higher than that of macrolichens and both diversities are positively correlated (Bergamini, Stofer, Bolliger, & Scheidegger, ), we assume that the total lichen richness per plot also would exceed average values of most parts of other European countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…() in a German low‐mountain range, Chongbang, Keller, Nobis, Scheidegger, and Baniya () in Eastern Nepal, Cleavitt et al. () in the northeastern United States, Cobanoglu and Sevgi () in Turkey, and Nascimbene and Marini () in northern Italy. This is probably a methodological issue as we, and the other studies reporting a linear increase in lichen species richness with elevation, sampled a local elevational gradient within forest ecosystems without exceeding the timberline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dispersal limitations and establishment constraints are addressed to explain the dynamics of lichen populations (Scheidegger & Werth 2009;Ellis 2012;Schei et al 2012). Interactions between morphological and reproductive traits of different lichen species and micro-environmental conditions, including physical and chemical properties of substrates, microclimate and biotic features (Seaward 1977;Lawrey 1991;McIlroy de la Rosa et al 2013;Nascimbene & Marini 2015), are suggested to shape spatial distribution patterns (Ellis & Coppins 2007;Spitale & Nascimbene 2012;Giordani et al 2014). However, the dispersal and establishment patterns, and their significance for structuring species distribution, have only recently begun to be deeply explored, mainly focusing on epiphytic lichens (Scheidegger & Werth 2009;Ellis 2012;Leavitt & Lumbsch 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%