2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Episodic autobiographical memory in depression: Specificity, autonoetic consciousness, and self-perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
147
1
10

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
18
147
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern of responses was in line with their difficulty in reporting and reliving episodic details, especially in terms of perceptual and affective details, and their inclination to instead report generic memories. Indeed, in general an observer perspective characterizes semanticized memories (Robinson and Swanson, 1993;Crawley and French, 2005;Nigro & Neisser, 1983;Piolino et al, 2006), detachment from emotional content (D'Argembeau, Comblain & Van der Linden, 2003;Nigro & Neisser, 1983;Lemogne et al, 2006) and from the current self (Libby & Eibach, 2002;Wilson & Ross, 2003). These findings provide some view about the affective and cognitive (goals, A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 21 beliefs) components of memories and self in fv-FTD.…”
Section: Characteristics and Cognitive Mechanisms Of Am Deficits In Pmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This pattern of responses was in line with their difficulty in reporting and reliving episodic details, especially in terms of perceptual and affective details, and their inclination to instead report generic memories. Indeed, in general an observer perspective characterizes semanticized memories (Robinson and Swanson, 1993;Crawley and French, 2005;Nigro & Neisser, 1983;Piolino et al, 2006), detachment from emotional content (D'Argembeau, Comblain & Van der Linden, 2003;Nigro & Neisser, 1983;Lemogne et al, 2006) and from the current self (Libby & Eibach, 2002;Wilson & Ross, 2003). These findings provide some view about the affective and cognitive (goals, A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 21 beliefs) components of memories and self in fv-FTD.…”
Section: Characteristics and Cognitive Mechanisms Of Am Deficits In Pmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This could be explained by previous research suggesting that a field perspective is (automatically) adopted when a memory is more congruent with the current self-concept, while observer perspective is more adopted in the case of inconsistency with currently activated self-views (Libby & Eibach, 2002;Wilson & Ross, 2003). Healthy individuals often consider positive memories more in line with a current self, so positive memories are often recalled from a field perspective (Libby & Eibach, 2002;Wilson & Ross, 2003), while (sub-clinical) depressed individuals have a tendency to recall positive memories from an observer perspective (Lemogne et al, 2006;Nelis et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, because both self and AM are implicated in clinical depression (Barry, Naus, & Rehm, 2006;Lemogne et al, 2006), research could focus on the distributions of memories cued by positive and negative statements. Rubin and Berntsen (2003) found that reminiscence bumps were generated only for highly positive events, not for negative events.…”
Section: Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%