2016
DOI: 10.1086/684253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Episodic Dissolution, Precipitation, and Slip along the Heart Mountain Detachment, Wyoming

Abstract: A B S T R A C TThe Heart Mountain allochthon is among the largest landslide masses in the rock record. The basal fault, the Heart Mountain detachment, is an archetype for the mechanical enigma of brittle fracture and subsequent frictional slip on low-angle faults, both of which appear to occur at ratios of shear stress to normal stress far below those predicted by laboratory experiments. The location of the detachment near the base of thick cratonic carbonates, rather than within subjacent shales, is particula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An attempt was made to avoid large clasts when sampling, to aim for a more homogenous mixture of matrix material. The breccia varied widely from many meters thick and highly visible from up to 100 m away (e.g., Figure a) to under 1‐cm thick and barely detectable from 100 m away (Figure b; see also Swanson et al, ). Marble breccia (DET‐m) : These samples are exclusively from the unique basal cataclasite at White Mountain (Heart Mountain allochthon), where all of the hanging wall host is metamorphosed by local intrusions. These breccias were sampled from within 3 m of the detachment, but their distinctive appearance and proximity to metamorphic and magmatic features lead us to consider them separately from other detachment breccias (Figure c). Gouge (DET‐g for Mormon Mountains and HW‐g for Heart Mountain allochthon) : These samples are very fine‐grained cataclasites with no clasts visible, even with an optical microscope.…”
Section: Sample Texture Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An attempt was made to avoid large clasts when sampling, to aim for a more homogenous mixture of matrix material. The breccia varied widely from many meters thick and highly visible from up to 100 m away (e.g., Figure a) to under 1‐cm thick and barely detectable from 100 m away (Figure b; see also Swanson et al, ). Marble breccia (DET‐m) : These samples are exclusively from the unique basal cataclasite at White Mountain (Heart Mountain allochthon), where all of the hanging wall host is metamorphosed by local intrusions. These breccias were sampled from within 3 m of the detachment, but their distinctive appearance and proximity to metamorphic and magmatic features lead us to consider them separately from other detachment breccias (Figure c). Gouge (DET‐g for Mormon Mountains and HW‐g for Heart Mountain allochthon) : These samples are very fine‐grained cataclasites with no clasts visible, even with an optical microscope.…”
Section: Sample Texture Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Only veins of at least 2‐mm width could supply enough material to analyze, limiting the number of these analyses. Detachment breccia (DET‐b) : These samples were all collected from within 1 m of the detachment surfaces (except ES12‐18, at 12 m below the detachment) and predominantly within 10 cm. They consist of a fine‐grained matrix and angular clasts (Figures a, c, and d), some of which appear to be clasts of an earlier brecciation episode Figure in Swanson et al, ). An attempt was made to avoid large clasts when sampling, to aim for a more homogenous mixture of matrix material.…”
Section: Sample Texture Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our approach is to present here a kinematic model based on reconstruction of the dismembered Mesozoic thrust system and does not depend on structural reconstruction of individual fault blocks in the Mormon Peak allochthon. Thus, although we acknowledge the central importance of fluid-assisted deformation in the development of the Mormon Peak and other carbonate allochthons (e.g., Swanson et al, 2012Swanson et al, , 2016, it is beyond the scope of this paper to address this important issue.…”
Section: Other Interpretations Of the Mormon Peak Detachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalized geologic map of the Heart Mountain slide area. Modified from Hauge (1993) and Malone et al (2014a). incremental movement potentially lasting millions of years (Hauge 1985(Hauge , 1990Templeton et al 1995;Swanson et al 2016), and catastrophic emplacement of Paleozoic carbonate and Eocene volcanic rocks over a period of minutes to hours (Craddock et al 2009). The mechanism of upper-plate movement that allows for catastrophic emplacement along a lowangle surface with only minor associated deformation preserved above, along, or below the detachment is poorly understood.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%