2022
DOI: 10.4018/ijt.291551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epistemic Democracy and Technopolitics

Abstract: In this article I examine the structure of four deliberative models: epistemic democracy, epistocracy, dystopic algocracy, and utopian algocracy. Epistocracy and algocracy (which in its two versions is an extremization of epistocracy) represent a challenge to the alleged epistemic superiority of democracy: epistocracy for its emphasis on the role of experts; algocracy for its emphasis on technique as a cognitively and ethically superior tool. In the concluding remarks I will advance the thesis that these chall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have pointed out that the principles of deliberative democracy are meant to be understood as ideals. Under this conception, either we should strengthen these ideals in social media design, despite the influence of power and irrational behaviour (Fuchs 2015), or we should distinguish different models of epistemic deliberation within a democracy (Marrone, 2022). Similarly, Dahlberg (2001) has applied a deliberative model in the spirit of Habermas to investigate the prospects of online deliberation.…”
Section: Deliberative Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have pointed out that the principles of deliberative democracy are meant to be understood as ideals. Under this conception, either we should strengthen these ideals in social media design, despite the influence of power and irrational behaviour (Fuchs 2015), or we should distinguish different models of epistemic deliberation within a democracy (Marrone, 2022). Similarly, Dahlberg (2001) has applied a deliberative model in the spirit of Habermas to investigate the prospects of online deliberation.…”
Section: Deliberative Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%