2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10701-011-9581-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epistemic Primacy vs. Ontological Elusiveness of Spatial Extension: Is There an Evolutionary Role for the Quantum?

Abstract: A critical re-examination of the history of the concepts of space (including spacetime of general relativity and relativistic quantum field theory) reveals a basic ontological elusiveness of spatial extension, while, at the same time, highlighting the fact that its epistemic primacy seems to be unavoidably imposed on us (as stated by A.Einstein "giving up the extensional continuum . . . is like to breathe in airless space"). On the other hand, Planck's discovery of the atomization of action leads to the fundam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This classical action is the main tool for determining the phases inside the atom interferometer and for generating the classical trajectories that, in presence of Newtonian gravity, allow for instance to perform measures of g and test the universality of free fall. 10 .…”
Section: A Effective Particles In the Arms Of Atom Interferometers Fr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This classical action is the main tool for determining the phases inside the atom interferometer and for generating the classical trajectories that, in presence of Newtonian gravity, allow for instance to perform measures of g and test the universality of free fall. 10 .…”
Section: A Effective Particles In the Arms Of Atom Interferometers Fr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. [10] a heterodox proposal is advanced concerning the unavoidable epistemic primacy of this spatiotemporal intuition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hope our effort in this paper will add further impetus to put vigorous efforts in devel-oping unified field theories in many new ways by questioning the foundational hypotheses of the current working theories [8,9,[12][13][14]. Accordingly, we have put efforts to differentiate between epistemic and ontologic thinking [13,15] by tracing back to our evolutionary successes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%