2019
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.201900164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epitaxial Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Thin Films on Mo Back Contact for Solar Cells

Abstract: Single crystal Mo thin films are successfully grown on single-crystal sapphire {0001} substrates using a newly developed two-step sputtering method. Cu(In 1-x ,Ga x )Se 2 (CIGS) thin films are then epitaxially grown on the Mo thin films by three-stage co-evaporation. Following that, a CdS buffer layer is deposited on the epitaxial (epi)-CIGS thin films by a chemical bath deposition (CBD) method, leading to the overall epitaxial relations such as CdS{111}// CIGS{112}//MoSe 2 {0001}//Mo{110}//sapphire {0001}. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous works, the MoSe 2 growth has been found to be dependent on several factors such as substrate temperature, the Mo structural properties, (A)CIGS‐based layer deposition method, and even Na availability. [ 37–40,44,45 ] The observed MoSe 2 structure was previously related to CIGS solar cells with higher values of contact resistance, in comparison to random‐oriented MoSe 2 . [ 37,46–48 ] Nonetheless, Zhang et al showed that a solar cell containing a MoSe 2 layer with a perpendicular c‐axis orientation concerning the Mo surface significantly outperforms a device without this interface layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In previous works, the MoSe 2 growth has been found to be dependent on several factors such as substrate temperature, the Mo structural properties, (A)CIGS‐based layer deposition method, and even Na availability. [ 37–40,44,45 ] The observed MoSe 2 structure was previously related to CIGS solar cells with higher values of contact resistance, in comparison to random‐oriented MoSe 2 . [ 37,46–48 ] Nonetheless, Zhang et al showed that a solar cell containing a MoSe 2 layer with a perpendicular c‐axis orientation concerning the Mo surface significantly outperforms a device without this interface layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Chalcopyrite CuIn x Ga 1– x Se 2 (CIGSe) thin films have been studied for solar cell applications because of their high absorption coefficient. , Contrary to Si and GaAs solar cells, the performances of polycrystalline CIGSe (poly-CIGSe), despite including grain boundaries (GBs), are significantly higher than those of epitaxial CIGSe (epi-CIGSe). The peculiarity of CIGSe films is that higher performance devices use polycrystalline films instead of single crystals, which is in stark contrast to solar cells based on silicon or III–V materials. This outcome has led to the hypothesis that grain boundaries in CIGS films may either be benign or beneficial to device performance …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copper ternary chalcopyrite compounds of the family of {Cu, In, Se} such as CuInSe 2 and Cu 5 In 9 Se 16 with an energy gap and high absorption coefficient of the order of 1 eV and 10 5 cm -1 may act as an absorber in thin film solar cell [1,2,[7][8][9][10][11][12] devices. On the other hand, a variety of nanoparticles of semiconductors, for example TiO 2 and ZnO, can be incorporated into clay minerals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%