The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11074-5_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epithelial Cell Abnormalities: Squamous

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pap tests were reviewed by cytopathologists blinded to these proportions. Reviewers were asked to provide a cytologic interpretation according to The Bethesda System (TBS) for reporting cervical cytology [10,11]. For SMILE-dominant (≥50%) cases, a separate review for a defined set of architectural, cellular and background features was performed (W.R.G., Z.G., V.D., H.M.K.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pap tests were reviewed by cytopathologists blinded to these proportions. Reviewers were asked to provide a cytologic interpretation according to The Bethesda System (TBS) for reporting cervical cytology [10,11]. For SMILE-dominant (≥50%) cases, a separate review for a defined set of architectural, cellular and background features was performed (W.R.G., Z.G., V.D., H.M.K.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the diagnostic cytological and histological features of endocervical adenocarcinoma (EAC) and endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) are defined by The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology (5) and the WHO Classification of the Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs (6), respectively, there are currently no accepted lower grade precursor lesions for adenocarcinoma like there are the intraepithelial neoplasias for cervical squamous cell carcinoma (5)(6)(7)(8). In cytological cervical samples, a large amount of the lesions behind glandular diagnoses (atypical endocervical cells, NOS, atypical endocervical cells, favour neoplastic, endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ and endocervical adenocarcinoma) are non-neoplastic or of squamous or endometrial origin or other carcinomas leading to a low screening specificity for EAC and AIS (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They sometimes present finely granular chromatin but rarely hypochromasia and no or inconspicuous nucleolus. Such cells fall into the LSIL category as defined by the 2014 Bethesda classification . We are fully aware of the fact that bizarre cells of the ectocervix, as described above, may defy straightforward cytological classification in terms of the 2014 Bethesda classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This specific morphological cell type is not fully discussed in the third edition of the Bethesda classification. Nonetheless, a single picture resembling this type of cells is included (Figure 5.3 on page 139) and properly described but ultimately designated LSIL. In routine LBC practice, the dominant feature of LSIL is easily and accurately identified, and then a search for individual parabasal cells with possible atypia follows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation