2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35134-3
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epithelial TGFβ engages growth-factor signalling to circumvent apoptosis and drive intestinal tumourigenesis with aggressive features

Abstract: The pro-tumourigenic role of epithelial TGFβ signalling in colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial. Here, we identify a cohort of born to be bad early-stage (T1) colorectal tumours, with aggressive features and a propensity to disseminate early, that are characterised by high epithelial cell-intrinsic TGFβ signalling. In the presence of concurrent Apc and Kras mutations, activation of epithelial TGFβ signalling rampantly accelerates tumourigenesis and share transcriptional signatures with those of the born to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, patients with high [ 18 F]FDG and [ 18 F]FLT are more likely to have Kras mutations and therefore poor response to EGFR inhibition ( 22 ). Conversely, low [ 18 F]FDG and [ 18 F]FLT suggests alterations in TGFβ signaling, and these patients may have improved response to MEK or EGFR inhibitors ( 53 ). Ultimately, to establish the clinical significance of our findings, it is crucial to conduct further studies in patient cohorts, incorporating prospective multitracer biomarker validation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, patients with high [ 18 F]FDG and [ 18 F]FLT are more likely to have Kras mutations and therefore poor response to EGFR inhibition ( 22 ). Conversely, low [ 18 F]FDG and [ 18 F]FLT suggests alterations in TGFβ signaling, and these patients may have improved response to MEK or EGFR inhibitors ( 53 ). Ultimately, to establish the clinical significance of our findings, it is crucial to conduct further studies in patient cohorts, incorporating prospective multitracer biomarker validation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This highlights the unpredictable biology of a proportion of these early CRCs. The identification of novel factors which may enable risk stratification with greater accuracy would aid in the decision‐making and, indeed, certain molecular signatures have been identified which correlate with risk of distant metastases [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This highlights the unpredictable biology of a proportion of these early CRCs. The identification of novel factors which may enable risk stratification with greater accuracy would aid in the decision-making and, indeed, certain molecular signatures have been identified which correlate with risk of distant metastases[23].Given the complexity of the decision-making it seems prudent that such cases are discussed at specialist CRC (MDT) meetings and, if possible, one focused on advanced polyps. Indeed, such an approach has been advocated by the Significant Polyp and Early Colorectal Cancer (SPECC) programme group[24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loss of function or a buildup of acquired mutations in the major driver gene adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) is responsible for the development of CRC. 65 In the study by Baratti et al, 35 phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunits p110α (PIK3CA) mutations were found in 17/78 patients (25.0%), and APC mutations were found in 25/68 patients (36.7%); APC mutations were univariately related with better survival (p ¼ 0.03), and APC mutations were more prevalent in left-sided CRC. Yaeger et al 62 discovered a high enrichment of oncogenic alterations in APC and TP53 in left-sided initial tumors, and oncogenic abnormalities in APC were predictive of the survival status of CRC-PM following CRS (HR ¼ 0.57, p < 0.01).…”
Section: Apcmentioning
confidence: 99%