1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf02075404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EPR and magnetic studies on the regeneration of cobalt-molybdenum catalysts for coal liquefaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnetic property of Co sensitively reflects the chemical state of Co atoms and their mutual interactions. The magnetic study of Co−Mo catalysts has been conducted by several groups in oxidic , and sulfided states. In their magnetic study, Topsøe et al , reported that the effective magnetic moment of Co decreased as the temperature decreased for an unsupported Co−MoS 2 catalyst (Co/Mo = 0.0625) in which all the Co atoms were present as the Co−Mo−S phase according to MES measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic property of Co sensitively reflects the chemical state of Co atoms and their mutual interactions. The magnetic study of Co−Mo catalysts has been conducted by several groups in oxidic , and sulfided states. In their magnetic study, Topsøe et al , reported that the effective magnetic moment of Co decreased as the temperature decreased for an unsupported Co−MoS 2 catalyst (Co/Mo = 0.0625) in which all the Co atoms were present as the Co−Mo−S phase according to MES measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sulfur vacancy strength of MoS 2 –Mo 2 N and MoS 2 –MoC was obviously stronger than that of MoS 2 , indicating that MoS 2 –Mo 2 N and MoS 2 –MoC contain more S vacancies. At the same time, for MoS 2 –MoC, the parameter center signals showed axial anisotropy, g = 2.0508 and 1.9804, which were related to the bulk defects in MoS 2 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%