Foundations of Modern EPR 1998
DOI: 10.1142/9789812816764_0056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epr at Varian: 1954-1974

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high magnetic field induces strong Lorentz forces on the modulation coil, which cause vibrations in the probe head at the modulation frequency or its harmonics. This is called microphonics [9,23,24]. This interference tends to be in phase with the modulated EPR signal and can seriously deteriorate the signal-to-noise ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high magnetic field induces strong Lorentz forces on the modulation coil, which cause vibrations in the probe head at the modulation frequency or its harmonics. This is called microphonics [9,23,24]. This interference tends to be in phase with the modulated EPR signal and can seriously deteriorate the signal-to-noise ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pulse, continuous wave (CW), and rapid scan EPR measurements often have significant contributions from background signals due to a wide range of environmental interferences such as extraneous RF signals, temperature variations, vibrations and instrumental artifacts such as switching transients, eddy currents, reflections, ground loops, spins in materials of the resonator and sample holder, and many others. For example, Hyde [1] pointed out that magnetic field modulation introduces background problems due to forces on the wires and due to eddy currents induced in the cavity body. Pulsed EPR suffers deadtime after the pulse due to resonator ring-down, reflections, and switching transients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%