2010
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201001469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EPR‐Spektroskopische Charakterisierung lokaler nanoskopischer Heterogenitäten beim thermischen Kollaps thermoresponsiver dendronisierter Polymere

Abstract: Der Phasenübergang von thermoresponsiven dendronisierten Polymeren wurde durch CW‐EPR‐Spektroskopie auf molekularer Ebene charakterisiert. Die Aggregation des Polymers wird durch dynamische, nanometergroße Strukturinhomogenitäten eingeleitet, und die Dehydratisierung der Polymerketten zieht sich trotz des makroskopisch scharfen Phasenübergangs über einen Temperaturbereich von mindestens 30 K hin (siehe Bild).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While g iso of species B varied from 2.0061 to 2.0058, all other spectroscopic values resembled those of the static inhomogeneities. We have also recently observed such inhomogeneities that are dynamic in nature in a series of dendronized thermoresponsive polymers 5a. 8 Interestingly, in the wide realm of Pluronics triblock copolymers we find both, static and dynamic inhomogeneities.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While g iso of species B varied from 2.0061 to 2.0058, all other spectroscopic values resembled those of the static inhomogeneities. We have also recently observed such inhomogeneities that are dynamic in nature in a series of dendronized thermoresponsive polymers 5a. 8 Interestingly, in the wide realm of Pluronics triblock copolymers we find both, static and dynamic inhomogeneities.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In contrast, the shifting hyperfine coupling values of both species A and B for F68, F108, and F127 with PEO≥70 % could be explained by spin probes B exchanging between hydrophilic and hydrophobic environments on EPR timescales 5a. If a spin probe of species B exchanges fast enough (>10 7 s −1 ) between two environments, one only detects one line at an averaged field position between the pure species A and B.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Thus, the intramolecular rotation is restricted 2c. In addition, the hydrophilic microenvironment around the BDP fluorophore would change to be hydrophobic due to the dehydration of the OEG groups after heating 16d. That is, the polarity around the BDP is greatly decreased.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates a kinetically trapped mesophase separation and a system in a molecularly controlled non-equilibrium state. [44][45][46] These long-lived yet transient states are more polar than the initial state, suggesting that they are formed during cooling by rupture and dissolution of part of the mesostructures. They seem to be a consequence of the crystallization of larger pools of water in the nanostructured water/ IL system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%