2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2010.10.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EPR study of the adsorption of dioxin vapours onto microporous carbons and mesoporous silica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At higher P/P 0 (e.g., P/P 0 > 0.25), we observed that the 62.5 wt% materials display better DCB adsorption properties than Lignite HOK ® -Super. This behavior has been previously described in a study comparing dioxin adsorption properties of commercial microporous activated carbons (NORIT ® GL 50 and EVN.2) and mesoporous MTS (micelle-templated silicas) materials [28]. Thus, microporosity seems to have a positive influence on low-pressure adsorption of organic pollutant like dioxin whereas mesoporosity promotes high adsorption at higher relative pressure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…At higher P/P 0 (e.g., P/P 0 > 0.25), we observed that the 62.5 wt% materials display better DCB adsorption properties than Lignite HOK ® -Super. This behavior has been previously described in a study comparing dioxin adsorption properties of commercial microporous activated carbons (NORIT ® GL 50 and EVN.2) and mesoporous MTS (micelle-templated silicas) materials [28]. Thus, microporosity seems to have a positive influence on low-pressure adsorption of organic pollutant like dioxin whereas mesoporosity promotes high adsorption at higher relative pressure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In all cases, a bowl-ended Pyrex tube containing the sample was connected to the vaccum system via a glass metal fitting flange. Samples were measured following pre-evacuation (6)(7)(8)(9)(10) between room temperature and up to 300 1C, the temperature of full dryness, and the evacuation was continued for 2 h. N 2 and CO 2 adsorption isotherms of various coals were performed at 77 K and 196 K, respectively, utilizing pressures in the range of 1-1000 Torr, measured using a highly sensitive pressure transducer (Sensotec, model Super TJE, 0.05% FS), calibrated to an accuracy of 0.1 Torr. Initially, volume calibration was performed with He (UHP grade) at 77 K (by immersion in LN2) and at 196 K (by immersion in dry ice with ethanol bath).…”
Section: Surface Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 While EPR studies regarding the effects of oxidation on the structure and stability of carbon radicals date back to the early 1980's the focus of these early reports primarily characterized the changes to the structures under extremely harsh conditions (pH or temperature). [6][7][8] It is also known that paramagnetic molecular oxygen undergoes a Heisenberg spin exchange interaction with stable radicals that extremely broadens the EPR signal. [9][10][11] Recently, the nature of the carbon radicals stabilized in various coals as a function of the oxidation time was characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to state that extreme experimental conditions such as high temperatures and strongly acidic conditions, particularly those used by Ottaviani et al, have previously been reported [14][15][16] to induce similar effects on carbon EPR spectra.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%