2018
DOI: 10.1016/s1569-1993(18)30251-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EPS3.06 Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the CFTR corrector FDL169

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were obtained by PM density measurement for P67L- and L206W-CFTR, and the small increase in S549R-CFTR PM density upon addition of VX-445 to the type I corrector treatment reached significance in this assay ( Figure 1 C). Since the PM density assay allows for higher-throughput measurements, we also determined the effect of the type I correctors ABBV-2222 and FDL-169, which are in clinical development [ 42 , 43 ]. Similar to its effect on E92K-CFTR [ 27 ], ABBV-2222 exhibited higher efficacy to correct the folding defect of P67L- and L206W-CFTR in comparison to other type I correctors ( Figure 1 C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were obtained by PM density measurement for P67L- and L206W-CFTR, and the small increase in S549R-CFTR PM density upon addition of VX-445 to the type I corrector treatment reached significance in this assay ( Figure 1 C). Since the PM density assay allows for higher-throughput measurements, we also determined the effect of the type I correctors ABBV-2222 and FDL-169, which are in clinical development [ 42 , 43 ]. Similar to its effect on E92K-CFTR [ 27 ], ABBV-2222 exhibited higher efficacy to correct the folding defect of P67L- and L206W-CFTR in comparison to other type I correctors ( Figure 1 C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%