“…Fitting the conductivity data according to Equations () and () reveals that the f c of CNT/ARE and SiO 2 @CNT/ARE composite films are 2.60 and 3.41 vol%, respectively. Since SiO 2 acts as an insulator and reduces the electrical conductivity when loaded on the CNT, in addition, the SiO 2 on the CNT surface prevents direct contact with each other and delays the establishment of the conductive network inside the composite, 24,25 as can be seen according to Figure 4C, the conductivity of 2.41 vol% CNT/ARE is 2.62 × 10 −8 S/m, whereas the conductivity of 3.22 vol% SiO 2 @CNT/ARE after the SiO 2 loading is 1.22 × 10 −8 S/m. Furthermore, the SEM images of the fracture surface of the composite film illustrate that SiO 2 @CNT is more compatible with the ARE, and SiO 2 @CNT can be dispersed more homogeneously in the ARE, retarding the establishment of the conductive paths and improving the value of f c . where, σ , , and denote the DC conductivity, the volume fraction, and the percolation threshold of the composite, respectively 26 …”