1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf02013981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epstein-Barr virus-specific immunoglobulin A in patients with infectious mononucleosis, an age-dependent factor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The IgA antibodies to VCA, considered as an early response in infectious mononucleosis (15,17,18), were, in our study, not restricted to the early acute phase of the EBV infection. In fact, although their prevalence in children with IM was not comparable to that of children with serological indications of a recent asymptomatic infection, they were also present in subjects with remote immunity and were equally distributed among all age groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…The IgA antibodies to VCA, considered as an early response in infectious mononucleosis (15,17,18), were, in our study, not restricted to the early acute phase of the EBV infection. In fact, although their prevalence in children with IM was not comparable to that of children with serological indications of a recent asymptomatic infection, they were also present in subjects with remote immunity and were equally distributed among all age groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…These antibodies reach a peak level 3-4 wk after primary infection and decline slowly, but may last indefinitely. Different studies have found them in 35%-74% of acute cases [34,127,128] , but they were also seen in 10% of healthy subjects. High levels were also found in patients with immunodeficiencies, recurrent parotitis, multiple sclerosis or nasopharyngeal cancer, as well as in pregnant women and elderly subjects [26,[129][130][131][132] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, enzyme assays are preferable to radioimmunoassays (RIA) (5, 16-18, 20, 23, 25, 26), as the high costs of equipment and reagents, the short shelf life of reagents, and concern for radioactivity are well-recognized limitations of RIA. Immunofluorescence tests (IFT) (6,14,17,24,25) are too laborious to be used routinely.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%