2019
DOI: 10.1111/geer.12186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epstein–Zin Utility, Asset Prices, and the Business Cycle Revisited

Abstract: This paper discusses the advantages of Epstein and Zin (1989) (EZ) preferences when building dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models that are consistent with well‐known stylized facts of both the business cycle and asset markets. To this end, we combine EZ preferences with several building blocks from the DSGE literature that has tried to solve the equity premium puzzle and to replicate characteristic statistics of the labor market. Our goal is to guide researchers in this area to useful modeling … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recursive non-expected utility can be used to separate risk aversion from intertemporal substitution (i.e. riskneutral preferences with respect to income fluctuations prevent counterfactual excess of young agents' savings; see Farmer, 1990;Heiberger and Ruf, 2019). Separating the co-efficient of intertemporal substitution, σ = 1/(1 − ρ), from risk aversion, as done in the utility function, helps to reproduce reasonable responses of consumption and savings to interest rate variations.…”
Section: Decision Problem Of Retirees and Workersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recursive non-expected utility can be used to separate risk aversion from intertemporal substitution (i.e. riskneutral preferences with respect to income fluctuations prevent counterfactual excess of young agents' savings; see Farmer, 1990;Heiberger and Ruf, 2019). Separating the co-efficient of intertemporal substitution, σ = 1/(1 − ρ), from risk aversion, as done in the utility function, helps to reproduce reasonable responses of consumption and savings to interest rate variations.…”
Section: Decision Problem Of Retirees and Workersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is extensively discussed in the literature (Gertler, 1999;Ferrero, 2010;Carvalho et al, 2016), this lifecycle model is analytically tractable because the transition probabilities to retirement and death are independent of age. Separating the elasticity of intertemporal substitution, σ ≡ (1 − ρ) −1 , from risk aversion in (2) allows for a reasonable response of consumption and savings to changes in interest rates (Farmer, 1990;Heiberger and Ruf, 2019).…”
Section: Decision Problem Of Retirees and Workersmentioning
confidence: 99%