1993
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-821x(05)80365-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ePTFE grafts for femoro-crural bypass—Improved results with combined adjuvant venous cuff and arteriovenous fistula?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scheltinga et al 11 and Ducasse et al 12 reported no significant difference in primary patency between groups at 12 months, with Harris et al 15 reporting a 2-year primary patency rate of 61% for prosthetic grafts with adjuvant AVF and vein cuff, 25% for grafts with AVF alone and 64% for vein grafts.…”
Section: Effects Of Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Scheltinga et al 11 and Ducasse et al 12 reported no significant difference in primary patency between groups at 12 months, with Harris et al 15 reporting a 2-year primary patency rate of 61% for prosthetic grafts with adjuvant AVF and vein cuff, 25% for grafts with AVF alone and 64% for vein grafts.…”
Section: Effects Of Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Harris et al 15 retrospectively compared synthetic bypass with adjuvant AVF with autologous bypass alone.…”
Section: Description Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Currently two types of popular geometries used in peripheral bypass operation, Miller cuff and Taylor patch were reported to have favorable performance (Taylor et al, 1992;Harris et al, 1993;Perktold et al, 2002), but only limited to below-keen popliteal bypasses. Lei et al (1997) developed optimal femoral bypass geometry with a large hood and much smoother transition at the toe and heel compared to the conventional and Taylor patch geometry that minimizes WSS gradient.…”
Section: Measurements and Comparison Of Two Distal Anastomosis Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%