1972
DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(72)90785-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equal comfort contours for whole body vertical, pulsed sinusoidal vibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a subjective magnitude of 100, greatest sensitivity (i.e., where the acceleration required to cause a given level of discomfort is least) was at 5 Hz, consistent with previous studies using a variety of psychophysical methods for evaluating vibration discomfort (e.g., Dupuis et al, 1972;Jones and Saunders, 1972;Griffin, 1976;Griffin et al, 1982;Corbridge and Griffin, 1986;Morioka and Griffin, 2006a;Zhou and Griffin, 2014b). These studies investigated various ranges of vibration magnitude, vibration frequency, and durations of vibration, but the contours have broadly similar shapes, with the exception of the reduced sensitivity to higher frequencies in the studies reported by Dupuis et al (1972) and Jones and Saunders (1972) (see Figure 10 in Zhou and Griffin, 2014b).…”
Section: In Terms Of Unweighted Vdvsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For a subjective magnitude of 100, greatest sensitivity (i.e., where the acceleration required to cause a given level of discomfort is least) was at 5 Hz, consistent with previous studies using a variety of psychophysical methods for evaluating vibration discomfort (e.g., Dupuis et al, 1972;Jones and Saunders, 1972;Griffin, 1976;Griffin et al, 1982;Corbridge and Griffin, 1986;Morioka and Griffin, 2006a;Zhou and Griffin, 2014b). These studies investigated various ranges of vibration magnitude, vibration frequency, and durations of vibration, but the contours have broadly similar shapes, with the exception of the reduced sensitivity to higher frequencies in the studies reported by Dupuis et al (1972) and Jones and Saunders (1972) (see Figure 10 in Zhou and Griffin, 2014b).…”
Section: In Terms Of Unweighted Vdvsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In the design stage of the vehicle development process when the real vehicle is not available, simulation is the only approach for the vehicle ride quality estimation [22]. Conventionally, ride quality was estimated by calculating jerk, acceleration, and velocity responses separately and applying each in the appropriate frequency interval [23]. Although there is still a great deal of controversy over which variables are most important in the effort on ride rating, many investigators have described vibration criteria in terms of acceleration amplitude as a function of frequency [24][25][26].…”
Section: Vehicle Ride Comfort Evaluation Based On Human Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many published results on the use of shaker table tests to measure discomfort indices. For instance, in [7] 30 men and 30 women participants were exposed for 8-second vibratory inputs in an experimental study with unrestrained sitting positions on the vibrator plate; in [8] 16 subjects participated in the tests and 6 different automotive seat combinations were attached to a shaker to conduct experiments to define "bad", "worst" and "good" seats. Although this area of research has been explored extensively, the test setups may not capture the complexity of vibration input required and further they do not include the effects of the surroundings inside the vehicle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At around 20-30 Hz head experiences resonance. Four Hz is observed to create discomfort in humans because shoulder, neck and head resonate in some combination at around this frequency [7,9,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation