Equality in contention: exploring the debates of gender-equal inheritance rights in Bangladesh

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to evaluate what caused the debates and confusion in articulating a gender-equal inheritance policy in Bangladesh, and to identify the socio-political drivers and nature of the political power play that thwarted the policy’s adoption.Design/methodology/approachThe research undergirding this paper is based on a qualitative approach involving a case study with in-depth semi-structured interviews, focus-group discussions, and secondary data analysis. The interviews were conducted with policy makers, officials, lawyers, women activists, Muslim religious scholars, Hindu priests, academics and researchers, and women representing Hindu and Muslim religions.FindingsThe findings illustrate that the controversies between the Islamic religion and national and international policies led to serious debates and confusion about gender-equal rights of inheritance in Bangladesh. The failure to formulate and adopt a gender-equal inheritance policy was influenced by several socio-political phenomena and gender-biased institutional settings. This kind of policy is deeply political, and cultural compatibility is necessary to formulate it, especially when the policy affects religious sentiments. Religious sentiments and beliefs, which are associated with religion-based personal law, therefore influence both the formulation or non-formulation of a gender-equal policy. To move forward with the fundamental idea of women’s inclusion, there is a strong need to identify the socio-cultural and political drivers behind formulating, non-formulating, as well as implementing a gender-equal policy.Originality/valueThe paper will be beneficial to scholars and policy makers who seek to explore the epicenter of challenges and opposition to formulating a gender-equal policy in the context of a developing country with a Muslim majority.

DHR‐PA—Democracy and human rights in public administration in Africa

“…There have been tremendous global, regional, and national policy efforts and research agendas to refocus public administration toward paying more “attention [to] the role of citizens in the work of government to help address the pervasive citizenship and democratic deficits” (Nabatchi, 2010, p. 376). The ever‐expanding body of whistleblowing research in public administration (e.g., Domfeh & Bawole, 2011; Nwoke, 2019; Onyango, 2021) and social equity (Frederickson, 2010; Johnson & Svara, 2015) or gender equality (Bekana, 2019; Hossain & Jamil, 2022; Onyango & Akinyi, 2023) can be cases in point in this regard. Essentially, the citizen‐centeredness of public administration underscores the values‐premise, which measures DHR‐PA constructs like administrative justice, responsiveness, representation, accountability, fairness, citizen participation, equity, and equality (cf.…”

Breaking Chains and Building Empires: Unleashing Women's Potential through Education for Property Rights in Malakand Division, Pakistan

“…The historical context of women's rights in Pakistan, particularly in the Pakhtun society and Malakand Division, reflects a longstanding imbalance where women were perceived as the property of men, devoid of legal rights. Hossain and Jamil (2023) note that conflicts and violence have been unfortunate norms for women seeking their rightful share in property rights. However, a nuanced perspective emerges, suggesting that the attainment of property rights can be achieved through negotiation and table talks, a process facilitated by education among the masses.…”