1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf00598024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Equality, quality and quantity: The elusive triangle in Indian education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, it opens the question of seeking variation among different kind of institutions at different level. In fact, Naik (1979) observes that there is lack of clarity over 'quality' that stems from taking either input or output as sole criterion. On the other hand, the 'internationalisation' of higher education is articulated in terms of mobility of students, faculty as well as collaboration that might be in nature of joint curricula among institutions or joint research (Altbach 2009; Harris 2011; Deshpande 2012; Wadhwa and Jha 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, it opens the question of seeking variation among different kind of institutions at different level. In fact, Naik (1979) observes that there is lack of clarity over 'quality' that stems from taking either input or output as sole criterion. On the other hand, the 'internationalisation' of higher education is articulated in terms of mobility of students, faculty as well as collaboration that might be in nature of joint curricula among institutions or joint research (Altbach 2009; Harris 2011; Deshpande 2012; Wadhwa and Jha 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such legacy continues to exist or has been intensified in the period after Gaudino (1965) or Naik (1979) writings. Similarly, Jayaram (2004) writes that more than 80 per cent of students study in state universities, but these universities have not changed on the frontier of teaching-learning (or improvement in quality and in fact there are cases of degree without imparting any sort of knowledge).…”
Section: Mass-elite Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While cultural diversity itself must be recognised in terms of allowing for diversities and variation in content, pedagogy and languages of education, it is important for the state to emphasise an inclusive definition of value education by which universal values, such as 'democracy, secularism, gender equity, work culture and social justice' 19 can be integrated into the curriculum. J.P. Naik (1975), the eminent educationist, had astutely noted issues of equality, quality and quantity to be the 'elusive triangle' in the Indian education system. But, in the context of urgently addressing the long-elusive goal of universal elementary education, it may be pertinent to focus on a new triangle, which will help in institutionbuilding for an elementary education system and which will encompass or enable the pursuit of equality and quality in education opportunities.…”
Section: S C H O O L D I F F E R E N T I a T I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis by educators reveals that secondary education has been the weakest link in Indian education. Naik (1975) points out that, in India, higher education has always received the highest emphasis because of its heavy social demand and primary education in India has also received a heavy emphasis because of 'populist stances'. As a consequence, secondary education, wedged in the middle, gets improper attention and growth.…”
Section: The Secondary Education System: An Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%